Why not Slackware, the original?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
15-Way Linux OS Comparison Shows Mixed High-Performing Linux Distributions
Collapse
X
-
Interesting results, there are clear differences to be seen, depending on the load. Well worth the time and effort to do this benchmarking.
Thank +1000000 for including real-world Go benchmarks too, those figures are super useful. I must admit that I dont spend barely enough time playing thing like Xonotic .... but I do get to play a lot with Golang though.
Thanks again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sloth View PostYeah that sqlite result is suspicious. There's so much variation that you really need to understand that in order to trust the rest of the testing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bvbfan View PostDebian Testing is rolling as Arch, nothing surprisingly
Here is the link
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/d...oosing.en.html.
Debian Testing brings the best of both the worlds. Fast "latest" stable software.Last edited by sarfarazahmad; 10 March 2016, 04:29 AM.
Comment
-
I've been using Debian stable for years now. I built a new computer over the weekend, and (while waiting for more funds for a dedicated GPU), I borrowed my spouse's R9 285. Intending to run amdgpu, I tried recompiled the kernel, DDX and Mesa (after upgrading to the newer Clang/LLVM through the Clang repos), but Xorg would always crash on launch. The stack trace suggested a mix of the old and new Clang libraries was going on, and instead of spending even more hours trying to figure it out, I bit the bullet and upgraded to Debian Testing.
I was really worried it would be unpleasantly unstable and incompatible with all my various customisations I'd made over the years, but it's been working out really well. Seeing these benchmarks has helped reinforce the feeling that I've made the right choice.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I'm disappointed Void didn't have the right software packages to tackle some of the benchmarks. But otherwise, it did well - nothing to be embarrassed about.
But yes, yay Debian. It's nice to see that "long time between stable releases" != "slow"
Comment
-
Originally posted by debianxfce View PostI am trolling: Debian stable believers, how does it feel to use 3 year old buggy and slow os.
This is just to say that Debian stable can be stable AND you can have some of the (roughly) latest stuff too, provided by backports. Just because people keep repeating that Debian stable is "old software", it doesn't make it true. For instance, Debian 8 has had (since it launched ~1 year ago) more up-to date packages than the current Ubuntu LTS (14.04). Sure, when 16.04 comes out that won't be true anymore, but only for ~1 year, until Debian 9 comes out.
I realize your nickname is debianxfce, so I assume you are well acquainted with Debian and how it works . This post is just for other people reading this thread who might not get the full picture.
Comment
Comment