My point is that it is a ripoff from arch linux. Just because he has written the package manager based at looking at the code of pacman. If you look at the source code of both pacman and xbps you will see its very similar.
The templates and PKGBUILD files are almost the same only that it has different name conventions. Everyone can edit the package manager and rename some parts of code so that it looks different.
Crosscompiling is supported by makepkg anyhow, you just change the flags of the makepkg.conf and start cross compiling.
edit: I am not saying he is lying about writing the package manager. I am just saying it is a re-spin of the code.
The templates and PKGBUILD files are almost the same only that it has different name conventions. Everyone can edit the package manager and rename some parts of code so that it looks different.
Crosscompiling is supported by makepkg anyhow, you just change the flags of the makepkg.conf and start cross compiling.
edit: I am not saying he is lying about writing the package manager. I am just saying it is a re-spin of the code.
Comment