Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fedora Decides On Headless Java, Third-Party Repos

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic Fedora Decides On Headless Java, Third-Party Repos

    Fedora Decides On Headless Java, Third-Party Repos

    Phoronix: Fedora Decides On Headless Java, Third-Party Repos

    The Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee is back in the season of evaluating features for the next Fedora Linux release...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU0MTM

  • Veerappan
    replied
    Originally posted by panda84 View Post
    Then, if the Oracle application requires it, install the headfull version. Luckily the world doesn't depend only on Oracle.
    Sadly, at work mine does...

    Leave a comment:


  • panda84
    replied
    Originally posted by Delgarde View Post
    I wouldn't count on the latter... I know that at least some of the Oracle applications use Java-based graphical installers, so even though it's a server, you'd still need both a full version of Java, and X support...
    Then, if the Oracle application requires it, install the headfull version. Luckily the world doesn't depend only on Oracle.

    Leave a comment:


  • panda84
    replied
    Originally posted by bulletxt View Post
    Ubuntu has headless package from a lot of time
    ...because it imported the java headless package from Debian.

    Leave a comment:


  • bulletxt
    replied
    Ubuntu has headless package from a lot of time

    Leave a comment:


  • Delgarde
    replied
    The headless Java packages for Fedora 21 will have a smaller dependency chain and be more ideal for installing in server environments.
    I wouldn't count on the latter... I know that at least some of the Oracle applications use Java-based graphical installers, so even though it's a server, you'd still need both a full version of Java, and X support...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X