Originally posted by fenrus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fenrus Linux: A Distro For Performance, Developers
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by juanrga View PostMy worry was about the non-symmetric nature of the graphs. Google "misleading graphs"!
the primary objective for the graphs (for me at least) is to see if there's a regression, or an improvement, compared to a previous series of builds.
I do want to keep the graphs useful for that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by juanrga View PostThis means that average Joe will be reading on the graphs that Fenrus is, wow!, 100% faster regarding some test but only a 50% slower regarding another test, and he will be taking Fenrus to be a much faster distro when the reality would be that Fenrus and the other distro are on pair 2:1 vs 1:2 regarding both tests.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mir3x View PostBut how to install fenrus ? I cannot mount that image or write to dvd cause it has 20Gb ...
why can't you mount the img, u using vmware? u could always use a 32g usb pen ... he has no servers so he dumped all the software on the img
"This means that average Joe will be reading on the graphs that Fenrus is, wow!, 100% faster regarding some test but only a 50% slower regarding another test, and he will be taking Fenrus to be a much faster distro when the reality would be that Fenrus and the other distro are on pair 2:1 vs 1:2 regarding both tests"
it's called marketing, if he said "hey guys check my linux distro 1111" no one would care but since he has all these graphs that you look and go "no way" many more people will try it.
I still feel it's 2 early for this guy to be pimping thisLast edited by Pallidus; 26 March 2013, 07:12 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Performance a la Intel
Originally posted by fenrus View Postyeah I'll try to clarify the page tonight, clearly it's not well done right/clear enough right now; thanks for the feedback.
let me give a specific (but made up) example.
Say some test gives frames-per-second (e.g. a higher-is-better test).
And lets say, Fedora 17 is the best-of-the-rest at 50 frames per second.
If Fenrus Linux would also get 100 FPS, the score would thus be 200%, however, for the purpose of showing a delta, 100% is subtracted (hence the "delta") and the score will 'only' be "100%" in the graph.
If Fenrus Linux would get 25 FPS, the score would be 50%, but the delta would be 50% - 100% = -50% in the graph.
Well, your combination of a percentage with a baseline has a very interesting result for a distro marketed "for performance". If Fenrus is twice faster than distro B then the graph reads 100%, but if the distro B is twice faster than Fenrus the graph reads -50% (instead of -100%).
This means that average Joe will be reading on the graphs that Fenrus is, wow!, 100% faster regarding some test but only a 50% slower regarding another test, and he will be taking Fenrus to be a much faster distro when the reality would be that Fenrus and the other distro are on pair 2:1 vs 1:2 regarding both tests.Last edited by juanrga; 25 March 2013, 07:51 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
But how to install fenrus ? I cannot mount that image or write to dvd cause it has 20Gb ...
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by ryao View PostIf I recall, the person behind this has a forum account called fenrus. Anyway, he should look into using ZFS and DTrace.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pallidus View Postwaste of time
this thing is as alpha as alpha gets
why the fuck is it being promoted in phoronix since it's like 2 years away from being anything decent?
a better question
why is intel wasting time experimenting with distros and packages, should be working on the drivers that's what they should be doing, bunch of good for nothings, hey ive me 70% of thw windows driver performance and I won't complain no more
you did not read the website though since this is not an Intel project.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: