Originally posted by hedonist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canonical Improving The Thunderbird Snap For Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
I cannot be the only one who is actually quite happy with snaps. Not limited to GUI apps and with a wide variety of available software. Sure they arent perfect but they are good
- Likes 5
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pilino View PostYesterday: Canonical tells us snaps are great because they save packaging work: https://www.phoronix.com/news/FOSDEM-2024-Snaps
Today: Canonical reinvents the wheel for the 11th time, builds Thunderbird from source into their snap to get back the benefits of packaging yourself (supporting other architectures, compliance with own standards).
Logical disconnect?
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hedonist View Post
Eh nah, flatpak is actually good, snaps suck cus they are a proprietary format and the backend is fully controlled by canonical and is a closed ecosystem.
Flatpak is an open ecosystem and the whole stack is fully open source, if you as a developer dont want to use the primary flathub repo you can easily make your own that can be sideloaded with an infinite number of other repos using the official tooling.
Having a cross-distro package format is good (and i would argue a necessity), but snap should not be that format. The whole linux ecosystem should be behind flatpak which embodies the ideals of the linux community and the philosophy of open source, not a proprietary corpo that wants ultimate control.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ferry View Post
Maybe they should drop the schnapps, sixpacks and just stay with debs.
Flatpak is an open ecosystem and the whole stack is fully open source, if you as a developer dont want to use the primary flathub repo you can easily make your own that can be sideloaded with an infinite number of other repos using the official tooling.
Having a cross-distro package format is good (and i would argue a necessity), but snap should not be that format. The whole linux ecosystem should be behind flatpak which embodies the ideals of the linux community and the philosophy of open source, not a proprietary corpo that wants ultimate control.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Canonical should just drop snap support and focus solely on flatpaks. Snap has no uses anymore.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I am using this layout in Thunderbird. It works very well on screens with low resolution, like the laptop I use at work. People were ripping their panties in anger when it appeared, but I found it very useful.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pilino View PostYesterday: Canonical tells us snaps are great because they save packaging work: https://www.phoronix.com/news/FOSDEM-2024-Snaps
Today: Canonical reinvents the wheel for the 11th time, builds Thunderbird from source into their snap to get back the benefits of packaging yourself (supporting other architectures, compliance with own standards).
Logical disconnect?
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: