Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ubuntu 22.10 To Ship With WebP Image Support Out-Of-The-Box

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ubuntu 22.10 To Ship With WebP Image Support Out-Of-The-Box

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 22.10 To Ship With WebP Image Support Out-Of-The-Box

    Prior to this past week's Ubuntu 22.10 feature freeze, webp-pixbuf-loader was promoted to the main archive for allowing WebP images to have thumbnail support within the GNOME desktop on this next Ubuntu release and being able to open up WebP image files within the GNOME image viewer and the like...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    wait, they haven't had support for webp until now? Man no wonder everyone considers ubuntu a joke. now that webp is pretty much being EOLd by avif and jxl they add support for it? Calling ubuntu a joke is an insult to comedians.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
      wait, they haven't had support for webp until now? Man no wonder everyone considers ubuntu a joke. now that webp is pretty much being EOLd by avif and jxl they add support for it? Calling ubuntu a joke is an insult to comedians.
      Except for WebP being EOLd.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
        wait, they haven't had support for webp until now? Man no wonder everyone considers ubuntu a joke. now that webp is pretty much being EOLd by avif and jxl they add support for it? Calling ubuntu a joke is an insult to comedians.
        Which distros had it out of the box?

        Comment


        • #5
          So Linux Mint beat Ubuntu this time.


          Webp support was added to xviewer and thumbnailers.

          Comment


          • #6
            This is pretty much required, now that GNOME shipps all wallpapers in webp and so expects webp support.

            Comment


            • #7
              With webp-pixbuf-loader, GNOME's Nautilus file manager can display thumbnails for WebP images and it's needed for opening said images into the Eye of GNOME (EOG) image viewer or Shotwell.
              Can't speak for Ubuntu, but I installed webp-pixbuf-loader on my Debian testing machine recently after someone sent me an album encoded in webp. Works as expected, but Shotwell doesn't seem to make use of it and still can't open webp.

              Edit: Seen some signs on the Debian mailing lists that Shotwell will receive patches to make use of this library soon.
              Last edited by Brisse; 01 September 2022, 08:52 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                that supports both lossy and lossless compression and can handle animations too.
                Yeah. It's like they looked at APNG and said "That one thing which is such an idiotic decision that APNG support can never get into libpng because libpng is the reference implementation and APNG is a direct violation of the PNG specification... let's do more of that".

                Hell, why do we need any file extensions when we can mush everything together into a single file type?​

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ssokolow View Post

                  Yeah. It's like they looked at APNG and said "That one thing which is such an idiotic decision that APNG support can never get into libpng because libpng is the reference implementation and APNG is a direct violation of the PNG specification... let's do more of that".

                  Hell, why do we need any file extensions when we can mush everything together into a single file type?​
                  MKV has left the chat

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post

                    MKV has left the chat
                    I think you mean the Ogg container format... but at least they have the decency to define different extensions you're supposed to use for different media types, similar to how WMV and WMA are both just ASF with different contents and how a lot of 90s formats with different extensions are just RIFF containers.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X