Originally posted by schmidtbag
View Post
Originally posted by schmidtbag
View Post
Let's compare KDE 3.5.10 to brand new shiny hipster friendly KDE 5:
The former is stable as hell and never crashes on me even though I've replaced pretty much everything under the hood.
The latter crashes/freezes under so many conditions it's just mind boggling. Visit KDE bugzilla for insight.
The former is extremely snappy and very light on CPU/memory.
The latter consumes over 500MB while running nothing.
Maybe, just maybe KDE5 offers some new irreplaceable features? Hell, no, KDE 3.5.10 still has more useful applications and the ones I have in KDE 3.5 often have more features than their new counterparts. Do we have KNetStats for KDE 5? No. Maybe KSensors? No. Maybe KWeather? Yes, a brain dead plasmoid. Maybe transparent Kicker? Um, no, nothing at all - create your own theme please. Maybe a fast start menu which doesn't suck? No. KDE 5 devs refused to add back the XEmbed systray protocol for over 2,5 years which meant that all the application which used the old X systray protocal were invisible under KDE5. Wow.
You perfectly represent the new generation of dumb idiots who believe that less features equal more features. Who think that everything must be in shades of grey. Who believe that controls and text must all look the same. Because of people like you who run corporations we have abominations like Windows 8/10, ribbon UI, iOS 7 and higher, Gnome 3, Unity, KDE 5 and other totally unusable shit.
Look how beautiful KDE 3.5.10 is.
Look how pathetic KDE 5 is. Let's make everything gray because ... because we think it's cool.
Yes, I'm a troll. The sanest troll around I guess. Most others readily swallow and praise whatever shit they are offered and create all sorts of excuses to vindicate the taste of shit.
Leave a comment: