New Features Coming For Qt 5.4

[doom_Oo7]

I'm not sure if this is what you mean but there is a KCM to integrate systemd configuration in KDE System Settings : http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php...content=161871

Nice! One shold also make a wizard to create unit files easily.

[CTown]

However Kernel + Qt + systemd should be the single base lib of a good OS. Are there any systemd gui administrative tools only depending on the Qt libs ?

I'm not sure if this is what you mean but there is a KCM to integrate systemd configuration in KDE System Settings : http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php...content=161871

[Karl Napf]

New in Qt 5.5, Qt will be integrated into the systemd tree.

I doubt that: For that to happen Qt would need to be rewritten badly in C.

[curaga]

New in Qt 5.5, Qt will be integrated into the systemd tree.

[doom_Oo7]

Now you are talking about SystemD. Qt is just trying to create a good framework for creating
applications with C++.

However Kernel + Qt + systemd should be the single base lib of a good OS. Are there any systemd gui administrative tools only depending on the Qt libs ?

[Pajn]

Soon you can put Qt on top of a kernel, and you got everything you need for a full operating system.

Now you are talking about SystemD. Qt is just trying to create a good framework for creating
applications with C++.

[gufide]

It is a very recent list, and still very incomplete. Just a week ago it was empty. The only reason phoronix picked it up because an email was send out to make people start filling it out.

Well...

However, this Qt 5.4 feature list is far from being complete... We'll cover more of the Qt 5.4 improvements when the release nears

[carewolf]

It's odd that this list doesn't mention QtWebEngine (Blink bindings, aiming to replace QtWebKit) which was supposed to be biggest addition in Qt 5.4.
I've not heard about postponing it...

It is a very recent list, and still very incomplete. Just a week ago it was empty. The only reason phoronix picked it up because an email was send out to make people start filling it out.

[jayrulez]

Why does a widget toolkit have support for Bluetooth?
Do one thing, and do it well.

Seems Qt is bloated and try to do everything.
Qt is now a huge stack.

Is Qt going to be a full stack framework like the .NET Framework?

Soon you can put Qt on top of a kernel, and you got everything you need for a full operating system.

Qt is not solely a widget toolkit:



It is a full stack application framework much like .NET, yes.

It would be a good thing if you could create an operating system from Qt and a kernel.

What is the problem?

[useful_idiot]

Why does a widget toolkit have support for Bluetooth?
Do one thing, and do it well.

Seems Qt is bloated and try to do everything.
Qt is now a huge stack.

Is Qt going to be a full stack framework like the .NET Framework?

Soon you can put Qt on top of a kernel, and you got everything you need for a full operating system.

Obvious troll is obvious. Either that or just plain doesn't know what hes talking about.