an to improve the point, in agreements products/brand/specs don't necessarilly have to exist to be valid later on court, they are just metioned for future protections.
so the mention of android doesn't mean the current code for that platform but future code in case digia tries to close support later on for this platform, the same as qt free or x11 or any other term can be used to protect previous or future version of the code, not protected by the gpl license already.[judge and lawyers later on an actual trial will fight to define the code litigated precisely protected under those terms]
so the mention of android doesn't mean the current code for that platform but future code in case digia tries to close support later on for this platform, the same as qt free or x11 or any other term can be used to protect previous or future version of the code, not protected by the gpl license already.[judge and lawyers later on an actual trial will fight to define the code litigated precisely protected under those terms]
Comment