Originally posted by Honton
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GStreamer 1.2 Feature Release Is Now Available
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostNobody claims LGPL is non-free. Are you able to understand the simple FACT that the Qt CLA asks for an additional broad license which by nature is non-free, so that Qt can be dual licensed? If not, then good luck
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostPlease answer the question? Do you really think Digia wants your free code?Originally posted by Honton View PostIt gives KDE the right to re-license the LGPLed free version for linux ?
Leave a comment:
-
It's the same way of adoption as it is done with webkit. Now let me try to apply your logic: webkit is not free software, because otherwise Digia would not have merged it into Qt. Gnome heavily integrates with webkit-gtk, which also incorporates webkit (that apple crap, you know). Now you also can say, that gnome uses f** non-free software. Agreed?
And if you know so much about phonons history, you also should know that phonon actually was developed by kde developers to get away with relying on one solution for audio (just remember arts). As it turned out to be quite good Qt decided to make it available for everyone using qt and bundled it. They merged kdes phonon from time to time to stay up2date.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostPlease answer the question? Do you really think Digia wants your free code?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostLet me ask you the same thing. Do you really think Qt would accept your GPL+LGPLed code? That would imply Free software is acceptable for Qt
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostWhat are you so confused about? Do you really think Qt would merge up GPL code? No way, they want a non-free broad license for the code. That is why you are asked to sign the CLA. How hard can it be to understand such simple things?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostThis is ridiculous. No GPL code enters Qt. It has to rooadly licensed to Digia. That is what the CLA fuss is about!Qt is licensed under a commercial and open source license (GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1).
Even for a troll like you this shouldn't be hard to understand, but I am not expecting anything from you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostAre you claiming Qt would let free code go into Qt? Haha Qt won't accept free code. It needs to be turned non-free by the means of CLA or a copyright transfer. I suggest you go look up the copyright notice from Phonon on its time for "adoption".
That is the difference between you and me. I knpw what Im talking about and know Phonon's history.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: