Features Coming In The Xfce 4.12 Desktop

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67109

    Features Coming In The Xfce 4.12 Desktop

    Phoronix: Features Coming In The Xfce 4.12 Desktop

    Xfce 4.12 still hasn't been released yet and it's running months behind schedule. Xfce 4.12 will be a major update to the lightweight desktop that's becoming an increasingly used alternative to Unity and the GNOME Shell. Here's an update on some of the completed features...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • TheOne
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 469

    #2
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Features Coming In The Xfce 4.12 Desktop

    Xfce 4.12 still hasn't been released yet and it's running months behind schedule. Xfce 4.12 will be a major update to the lightweight desktop that's becoming an increasingly used alternative to Unity and the GNOME Shell. Here's an update on some of the completed features...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM5OTA
    I have been using most of those features already for months by using a PPA and they are pretty stable, they make XFCE a lot more usable. I guess that XFCE developers are somehow perfectionist for not releasing already.

    Comment

    • FutureSuture
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 304

      #3
      I have fallen in love with Xfce after using Manjaro Xfce for a while. Xfce has to be my second favourite desktop environment, right after KDE. It's only going to get better!

      Comment

      • Redi44
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2012
        • 235

        #4
        .icc profiles support would be nice

        Comment

        • mrugiero
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 1336

          #5
          Originally posted by TheOne View Post
          I have been using most of those features already for months by using a PPA and they are pretty stable, they make XFCE a lot more usable. I guess that XFCE developers are somehow perfectionist for not releasing already.
          I used to build git in a weekly basis, I even had a few scripts to do so. Then I switched computer and laziness won, so I'm using whatever version ships in Xubuntu.

          Comment

          • verde
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 255

            #6
            XFCE is a fantastic desktop environment for hardware-outdated systems! It consumes just 130-150mb of RAM on x32 versions and its GPU requirements are very basic.

            Of course visual experience is basic too, so on a modern system Unity is more reasonable choice.

            Comment

            • schmidtbag
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 6604

              #7
              Originally posted by verde View Post
              XFCE is a fantastic desktop environment for hardware-outdated systems! It consumes just 130-150mb of RAM on x32 versions and its GPU requirements are very basic.

              Of course visual experience is basic too, so on a modern system Unity is more reasonable choice.
              XFCE is ok P4 but any older than that, LXDE is a better choice. XFCE has a noticeable performance hit compared to LXDE on crappier hardware.

              Comment

              • Artemis3
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 183

                #8
                Originally posted by verde View Post
                XFCE is a fantastic desktop environment for hardware-outdated systems! It consumes just 130-150mb of RAM on x32 versions and its GPU requirements are very basic.
                Someone tested memory usage of basic desktop installs:


                I use Xubuntu but switched the desktop to E17, and the memory used went down from 150ish mb down to about 50 mb; looks better AND has more features than KDE, which is a memory hog and takes ages to load, comparable to Unity and Gnome 3 of course.

                But aside from E17 which might look intimidating for having so much customization (like KDE), XFCE, and LXDE are very good. For true old machines, you might go with IceWM or similar.

                The base system also helps. Instead of Xubuntu, try ubuntu minimal, (pick option command line only) then just the apt-get the package xfce4. Or switch distro if you don't care about Canonical repositories. I'm hoping for Bodhi Linux to improve, but they need to fix PXE install using their ISO. You might also try the Linux Mint flavors.

                Comment

                • spacetoilet
                  Phoronix Member
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 60

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Artemis3 View Post
                  Someone tested memory usage of basic desktop installs:


                  I use Xubuntu but switched the desktop to E17, and the memory used went down from 150ish mb down to about 50 mb; looks better AND has more features than KDE, which is a memory hog and takes ages to load, comparable to Unity and Gnome 3 of course.

                  But aside from E17 which might look intimidating for having so much customization (like KDE), XFCE, and LXDE are very good. For true old machines, you might go with IceWM or similar.

                  The base system also helps. Instead of Xubuntu, try ubuntu minimal, (pick option command line only) then just the apt-get the package xfce4. Or switch distro if you don't care about Canonical repositories. I'm hoping for Bodhi Linux to improve, but they need to fix PXE install using their ISO. You might also try the Linux Mint flavors.
                  cant wait for E17 to be on Wayland to test it

                  Comment

                  • Redi44
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 235

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Artemis3 View Post
                    ...
                    Cinnamon having only a bit more than XFCE?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X