ok I understand that people dont like it if something completely new is coming, because they used something like windows 95 style the last 20 years I get that, but why the hell do here 99% bitch around gnome-shell but bitch much less about unity?
unitys first version was way worse than gnome-shell was, it was unstable and has also very new paradigm that was close the gnome-shells, and today it has some advantages the hud thing seems to be nice but have much disadvantages still...
I can understand if you absolutly hate gnome-shell and unity, but loving unity and hating gnome-shell I cant understand. And why do you think that gnome-shell should be perfekt in version 3.4, was gnome 2.4 perfekt? no it wasnt. Is it a thing that gnome-devs dont hear what we want and we use Ubuntu so Ubuntu-devs cant be bad?
I can live with the unity and gnome-shell sucks at all guys but with the ones that hate gnome-shell but be ok with unity I can't or at least I dont understand that. I think thats just gnome-love-haters, they hate the devs but love gtk and other stuff like that...
arguing with absolutly uninteresting stuff that is "fixed" in 3.6 anyway like :
"GNOME 3, in my opinion, wasn't exactly user-friendly though.. when it seems to prefer hiding a lot of commonly used options, like the shutdown button for instance."
just get over your gnome-hate or do use something else... if you cant find any positive point in gnome 3 over gnome 2 hate it, then you most likely will also hate unity, but if you find 50-90% good stuff in it and hate 10% just install a few extentions or wait 1-2 versions... I think you all flame so much, to encurage the devs to do what you want... but its not constructive to hate-flame them to bring them to what you want to do, it does not work anyway mostly.
And be more open, that devs made some really good stuff you used gnome mostly for several years (or you stopped bitching around years ago anyway) so this devs cant be that stupid you think, so yes maybe they make some small mistakes here and there, but think first for one moment that you maybe could be the one that judge to fast.
So some guys bitch around the removing of nautilus tabs even they could not test it yet mostly. Instead of ohh I use that all 100 years one time so why would you remove that, think maybe they include a alternative that is better, maybe they tweak a bit the file folder opening of the gnome-shell if they would fix zeitgeist as example or integrate it more and 2 different folders would open better in seperate windows and maybe they change some other stuff as example with mid mouse or alt+enter a directory a new window of gnome pops up maybe thats more efficient.
I used this tab thing but very seldom and had to nearly force me to do it, it felt not very natural... so overthinking that is good, if they give you an good alterantive for that task I would be happy with it.
unitys first version was way worse than gnome-shell was, it was unstable and has also very new paradigm that was close the gnome-shells, and today it has some advantages the hud thing seems to be nice but have much disadvantages still...
I can understand if you absolutly hate gnome-shell and unity, but loving unity and hating gnome-shell I cant understand. And why do you think that gnome-shell should be perfekt in version 3.4, was gnome 2.4 perfekt? no it wasnt. Is it a thing that gnome-devs dont hear what we want and we use Ubuntu so Ubuntu-devs cant be bad?
I can live with the unity and gnome-shell sucks at all guys but with the ones that hate gnome-shell but be ok with unity I can't or at least I dont understand that. I think thats just gnome-love-haters, they hate the devs but love gtk and other stuff like that...
arguing with absolutly uninteresting stuff that is "fixed" in 3.6 anyway like :
"GNOME 3, in my opinion, wasn't exactly user-friendly though.. when it seems to prefer hiding a lot of commonly used options, like the shutdown button for instance."
just get over your gnome-hate or do use something else... if you cant find any positive point in gnome 3 over gnome 2 hate it, then you most likely will also hate unity, but if you find 50-90% good stuff in it and hate 10% just install a few extentions or wait 1-2 versions... I think you all flame so much, to encurage the devs to do what you want... but its not constructive to hate-flame them to bring them to what you want to do, it does not work anyway mostly.
And be more open, that devs made some really good stuff you used gnome mostly for several years (or you stopped bitching around years ago anyway) so this devs cant be that stupid you think, so yes maybe they make some small mistakes here and there, but think first for one moment that you maybe could be the one that judge to fast.
So some guys bitch around the removing of nautilus tabs even they could not test it yet mostly. Instead of ohh I use that all 100 years one time so why would you remove that, think maybe they include a alternative that is better, maybe they tweak a bit the file folder opening of the gnome-shell if they would fix zeitgeist as example or integrate it more and 2 different folders would open better in seperate windows and maybe they change some other stuff as example with mid mouse or alt+enter a directory a new window of gnome pops up maybe thats more efficient.
I used this tab thing but very seldom and had to nearly force me to do it, it felt not very natural... so overthinking that is good, if they give you an good alterantive for that task I would be happy with it.
Comment