Why Qt? Why not take advantage of the similar work already done, ie the Enlightenment netbook shell?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canonical's Working On A Unity 2D Desktop
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mendieta View PostIsn't there a clean way to just base both the Unity2D and 3D on Qt, on a way that uses hardware acceleration when available? That would be a lot cleaner, if feasible!
But Canonical claims that there is absolutely no accessibility on Linux and they are the heroes to provide it finally which ? according to them ? makes the Nux-based Unity necessary: http://kamikazow.wordpress.com/2011/...6/#comment-578 (J. Riddel is a Canonical employee)
Originally posted by curaga View PostWhy Qt? Why not take advantage of the similar work already done, ie the Enlightenment netbook shell?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View Posthttp://kamikazow.wordpress.com/2011/...6/#comment-578 (J. Riddel is a Canonical employee)
Maybe they realized that Qt is better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Misel View PostI tried getting along with Unity but it didn't work out. Two friends of mine and I have yet to find out how to even configure that thing. The most ridiculous thing is the panel on the left part of the screen. I couldn't figure out how to move it to another place or better yet make it autohide.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wyatt View PostAm I the only one who thinks this is a terribly confusing name, given that Unity is also the name of a popular game dev platform (if you're on Windows or Mac for now)? Why was this sort of name collision allowed to happen?
Comment
Comment