Originally posted by justin_webb
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MPV 0.34 Released For Popular Linux Media Player
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View PostAs for deinterlacing, I don't see the need for automatic deinterlacing. on every video player I've used, it is usually of mediocre consistency and I wind up manually enabling or disabling anyways.
While I respect OP's commitment to his vintage pr0n, ISTM that if he's still got media THAT old he'd be better off ripping it, deinterlacing it with an algorithm that doesn't suck (well, okay: "sucks less than most of the others", since they're all pretty terrible), and encoding the deinterlaced stream to h264 on a NAS instead.
Leave a comment:
-
I think what many in this Phoronix thread don't realise or don't emphasise enough is that MPV violates the hard earned intellectual properties of many western companies for their own gain.
Neither the MPV developer nor the MPV users pay patent royalties for highly advanced compression codec's such as HEVC, H.265 or AV1. This is because they were illegally obtained (pirated) from secured company servers by hackers working on behalf of the MPV developer.
The name of the application program, "MPV", actually is an acronym for "Many Previous Violations", meaning that they are seasoned criminals and not just amateurs in their basements. They likely have many underground organised crime connections.
You will no doubt have noticed that a lot of MPV users are Chinese. This is no coincidence as MPV is simply another case of Chinese infringement upon western intellectual property. They have no regard for the law of the United States or its colonies.
I think it is irresponsible of Phoronix to advertise this illegal media player when much better legal alternatives exist, such as the GStreamer based Totem player on the GNOME platform.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
Flatpak and snap should have a sandbox, sure it's a bit safer, but I've seen a lot of hacked sandboxes, so I've always thought that sandbox is just a myth.
Yes, maybe sandbox can be hacked, but it is defense in depth. With a sandbox you have an additional layer of security.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by brad0 View Post
Yet Linus' wouldn't pull some of the crap wm4 did.
There is more than just talent to being a developer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by uid313 View Post
More and more malware starts to target Linux. Firejail is great, but end-users don't know how to configure and setup firejail. It should run sandboxed without the user has to setup anything. It should be sandboxed by default.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View PostWM4 was wild, he was the evil version of old Linus, I would always get a kick from the stuff he wrote in commits
Originally posted by Quackdoc View PostHe may be a prick, but he was a talented coder.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by brad0 View Post
It was 50 / 50, for the good he did the other 50% was like him being a wrecking ball and screwing thing up. He wasn't ousted from the project for no reason.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: