Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MPV 0.34 Released For Popular Linux Media Player

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • alex19EP
    replied
    Originally posted by justin_webb View Post
    I think what many in this Phoronix thread don't realise or don't emphasise enough is that MPV violates the hard earned intellectual properties of many western companies for their own gain.

    Neither the MPV developer nor the MPV users pay patent royalties for highly advanced compression codec's such as HEVC, H.265 or AV1. This is because they were illegally obtained (pirated) from secured company servers by hackers working on behalf of the MPV developer.

    The name of the application program, "MPV", actually is an acronym for "Many Previous Violations", meaning that they are seasoned criminals and not just amateurs in their basements. They likely have many underground organised crime connections.

    You will no doubt have noticed that a lot of MPV users are Chinese. This is no coincidence as MPV is simply another case of Chinese infringement upon western intellectual property. They have no regard for the law of the United States or its colonies.

    I think it is irresponsible of Phoronix to advertise this illegal media player when much better legal alternatives exist, such as the GStreamer based Totem player on the GNOME platform.
    if it’s a joke, then I don’t understand it, and if not... I don’t even want to think about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • arQon
    replied
    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
    As for deinterlacing, I don't see the need for automatic deinterlacing. on every video player I've used, it is usually of mediocre consistency and I wind up manually enabling or disabling anyways.
    I'm not sure if you were just trying to be kind to OP out of sympathy for his condition, but it's worth pointing out that deinterlacing stopped having ANY value at all (as opposed to just dubious value) once we moved on from PAL/NTSC. That's about 15 years ago.

    While I respect OP's commitment to his vintage pr0n, ISTM that if he's still got media THAT old he'd be better off ripping it, deinterlacing it with an algorithm that doesn't suck (well, okay: "sucks less than most of the others", since they're all pretty terrible), and encoding the deinterlaced stream to h264 on a NAS instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • justin_webb
    replied
    I think what many in this Phoronix thread don't realise or don't emphasise enough is that MPV violates the hard earned intellectual properties of many western companies for their own gain.

    Neither the MPV developer nor the MPV users pay patent royalties for highly advanced compression codec's such as HEVC, H.265 or AV1. This is because they were illegally obtained (pirated) from secured company servers by hackers working on behalf of the MPV developer.

    The name of the application program, "MPV", actually is an acronym for "Many Previous Violations", meaning that they are seasoned criminals and not just amateurs in their basements. They likely have many underground organised crime connections.

    You will no doubt have noticed that a lot of MPV users are Chinese. This is no coincidence as MPV is simply another case of Chinese infringement upon western intellectual property. They have no regard for the law of the United States or its colonies.

    I think it is irresponsible of Phoronix to advertise this illegal media player when much better legal alternatives exist, such as the GStreamer based Totem player on the GNOME platform.

    Leave a comment:


  • uid313
    replied
    Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post

    Flatpak and snap should have a sandbox, sure it's a bit safer, but I've seen a lot of hacked sandboxes, so I've always thought that sandbox is just a myth.
    Flatpak and Snap does have support for sandbox mode, but it depends on how the package is configured. It can be confined as sandbox or as unconfined. As sandbox it can be configured with few or many permissions.

    Yes, maybe sandbox can be hacked, but it is defense in depth. With a sandbox you have an additional layer of security.

    Leave a comment:


  • brad0
    replied
    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
    While true there was a great deal of talent that he had, I can't help but wonder what it is being used for now
    Yet he was kicked out for all of the talent he had. Didn't do him any good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quackdoc
    replied
    Originally posted by brad0 View Post

    Yet Linus' wouldn't pull some of the crap wm4 did.
    Like I said, evil version lol

    There is more than just talent to being a developer.
    While true there was a great deal of talent that he had, I can't help but wonder what it is being used for now

    Leave a comment:


  • Charlie68
    replied
    Originally posted by uid313 View Post

    More and more malware starts to target Linux. Firejail is great, but end-users don't know how to configure and setup firejail. It should run sandboxed without the user has to setup anything. It should be sandboxed by default.
    Flatpak and snap should have a sandbox, sure it's a bit safer, but I've seen a lot of hacked sandboxes, so I've always thought that sandbox is just a myth.

    Leave a comment:


  • brad0
    replied
    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
    WM4 was wild, he was the evil version of old Linus, I would always get a kick from the stuff he wrote in commits
    Yet Linus' wouldn't pull some of the crap wm4 did.

    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
    He may be a prick, but he was a talented coder.
    There is more than just talent to being a developer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quackdoc
    replied
    Originally posted by brad0 View Post

    It was 50 / 50, for the good he did the other 50% was like him being a wrecking ball and screwing thing up. He wasn't ousted from the project for no reason.
    WM4 was wild, he was the evil version of old Linus, I would always get a kick from the stuff he wrote in commits, I wonder what he is doing now, He may be a prick, but he was a talented coder.

    Leave a comment:


  • brad0
    replied
    Originally posted by hax0r View Post
    it is an unmaintained abandonware at this point
    Come back to reality. Too many morons.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X