Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME 3.37.3 Released With More Features, Code Improvements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • curfew
    replied
    I'll never use any of those noob distros ever again. Happy Arch user since maybe a decade ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anvil
    replied
    Originally posted by curfew View Post
    Obviously the people who never use the first major release also do not know what the quality of that release is, so stop listening to these scaremongers, ffs.
    if you wanna see the first release, use Fedora Rawhide . , a lot of people just stay on Rawhide cause its not much difference from the " stable " release .

    Leave a comment:


  • ptomato
    replied
    Originally posted by curfew View Post
    This must obviously mean private class fields as there is no other visibility scope than public before this change. Every class field in JS is public by default.
    Hi, I'm the maintainer of GJS — it actually does mean public class fields. It refers to the new JavaScript syntax detailed here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/...c_class_fields

    Private class fields are not supported yet, as Firefox doesn't have them: https://caniuse.com/#search=private%20class%20fields

    Leave a comment:


  • starshipeleven
    replied
    Originally posted by curfew View Post
    Obviously the people who never use the first major release also do not know what the quality of that release is, so stop listening to these scaremongers, ffs.
    yeah, because it's not something that can be observed from outside like forum support or something.

    Leave a comment:


  • JackLilhammers
    replied
    Originally posted by Anvil View Post

    always wait for a .1 or .2 , never use a .0 of anything Gnome, you can Guarantee it'll be just as buggy , scroll down the page an you'll see the release schule . https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirtyseven
    Never use the .0 release of anything, unless you must or want to

    Leave a comment:


  • curfew
    replied
    Originally posted by Anvil View Post
    its true, as far as i know a lot of people that i know in Fedora IRC channel always used to an still do wait for the Point release than getting the .0 release, which is why there are point releases to fix up Bugs in the .0 release. ,
    Obviously the people who never use the first major release also do not know what the quality of that release is, so stop listening to these scaremongers, ffs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by mroche View Post

    Ironically, this has been a long term side project of mine. A small toy distro that is Wayland only, using a self-written WM/DE. Unfortunately systemd based, so I guess I get the bloat back :P

    Cheers,
    Mike
    Yep, systemd is a bigger beast.. however, systemd provides more functionality, and better seamless integration of various system components, which brings higher costs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anvil
    replied
    Originally posted by curfew View Post
    This FUD and scaremongering. NPCs always tell you to wait for the next minor release. Simply not true.

    With Gnome folks they don't always seem to backport fixes to even serious issues once they're done with the first couple of point releases. After that you simply have to wait and pray that the next major release is going to fix your issues. Once I reported an issue with mouse pointer being captured / locked (with 100 % reproduceability) and had to wait for two major releases for it to be fixed. They probably rewrote some code and it was fixed by accident.
    its true, as far as i know a lot of people that i know in Fedora IRC channel always used to an still do wait for the Point release than getting the .0 release, which is why there are point releases to fix up Bugs in the .0 release. ,

    Leave a comment:


  • andyprough
    replied
    Originally posted by mroche View Post

    Ironically, this has been a long term side project of mine. A small toy distro that is Wayland only, using a self-written WM/DE. Unfortunately systemd based, so I guess I get the bloat back :P

    Cheers,
    Mike
    Gentoo with openrc and dwm can allegedly get you down to around my target range of 45mb of memory usage when starting the session. That would address nearly all areas of bloat except for X. I'm not sure if you could get Gentoo/openrc running with wayland only, but that would be an interesting experiment.

    Leave a comment:


  • mroche
    replied
    Originally posted by kravemir View Post

    Port dwm to wayland, remove XWayland, remove X-only apps, or add native wayland support to these apps, and then the desktop would consume less memory, as there will be only dwm left, without bloated X server.
    Ironically, this has been a long term side project of mine. A small toy distro that is Wayland only, using a self-written WM/DE. Unfortunately systemd based, so I guess I get the bloat back :P

    Cheers,
    Mike

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X