Originally posted by kraftman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Starch Linux: OpenBSD Atop Arch's Linux Kernel
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by kraftman View PostNo, idiot. Show me BullShitDaily comparable security mechanism like Linux has. Linux is far more secure than your toy OS. BSD is no way advanced operating system! It's legacy OS that lacks ANY real world security protection. There's a reason why Linux was chosen by National Security Agency. One more thing: even Linux chroot is more secure than bsd jails, so don't compromise yourself further.
Also this mechanisms are too complex to be useful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BSD SUCKS DICKS View PostStop bull shitting, you mean they port Linux applications to their shitty as fuck portstree? thats what I meant by third part apps.
Originally posted by kraftman View PostIt gets them, because it's far more popular than bsd crap and more people are looking at it.
FAILed QA.
Originally posted by kraftman View PostNo, idiot. Show me BullShitDaily comparable security mechanism like Linux has.
Originally posted by kraftman View PostThere's a reason why Linux was chosen by National Security Agency.
Originally posted by kraftman View PostOne more thing: even Linux chroot is more secure than bsd jails
Comment
-
Originally posted by BSD SUCKS DICKS View Post1. OpenRC is SHIT. It's slow, BSD licensed. Systemd is way better.
2. musl and uClibc are jack fuck shit compared to glibc. glibc is robust, versatile, lightwieght and secure.
3. Both pacman and apk-tools are far superior to the rusty ports used in all BSDs.
OpenBSD is not more secure then Linux, its actually less secure because they do not have anything like AppArmor or SELinux. They rely on the hopes of their OS being bug free so if it isn't, there's no layers of defence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kraftman View PostOne more thing: even Linux chroot is more secure than bsd jails, so don't compromise yourself further.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BSD SUCKS DICKS View PostThere, Just relying on the barely OS to have no holes and thus no layers of protection.
They were pretty early with propolice and stack smashing protection. They implemented W^X and they are pretty good with privilege separation. (read about why they wrote their own ntpd and invented BSD auth instead of PAM and the privilege separation ideas they implemented there).
Basically, they assume that the software that runs is buggy and tries to make it hard to exploit those bugs. Thanks to this they have discovered many bugs in 3rd party apps and thus contributed that Linux userland has become safer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ncopa View PostThis is directly false.
They were pretty early with propolice and stack smashing protection. They implemented W^X and they are pretty good with privilege separation. (read about why they wrote their own ntpd and invented BSD auth instead of PAM and the privilege separation ideas they implemented there).
Basically, they assume that the software that runs is buggy and tries to make it hard to exploit those bugs. Thanks to this they have discovered many bugs in 3rd party apps and thus contributed that Linux userland has become safer.
Comment
-
It is fake
It's fake. Look at the project core repository (http://mirror1.starchlinux.org/pkg/core/) recomended for update. It install standard utillinux and coreutils packages. Nothing used from OpenBSD.
Comment
Comment