Arch BSD: Arch Linux Atop The FreeBSD Kernel

[Vim_User]

Call me what ever you like

No, I call you what you are, a wannabe troll.

BSD zealot/troll/luser

That is funny, I always wanted to have a look at one of the BSDs, but I have not found the mood and time for that yet.

Your the one and is the troll and I'm just telling what I researched

And your "research" shows us that all your sources, with one exception, is from an anti-BSD blog. If your research in school was (is?) from the same quality you must have failed miserably.

Trolling at Phoronix? You mean people just talking about the truths about BSD and how shit it is? If you don't like that don't join phoronix forums. This forum from what I seen repects free speech. If you don't like that fuk off to BSD forums where they only allow you to post things they like (not even questions).

Come back here once you suck it up cry bitch.

Ah, the good old swearing. Here we actually can see how bad at trolling you really are.

[Sergio]

Sergio: WAAAHH!!!!! WAAAAHH!!!! EVERYBODY HAS FOUND OUT BSD IS SHIT. WAAAHH!!!!!

Loser........

[systemd rulez]

The fucking irony... loser.

Sergio: WAAAHH!!!!! WAAAAHH!!!! EVERYBODY HAS FOUND OUT BSD IS SHIT. WAAAHH!!!!!

[LightBit]

Here: http://trl.ca/2007/04/theo-de-raadt-...gpl-violation/

Code was removed and it isn't "regular basis".

[Sergio]

Seriously, grow up

The fucking irony... loser.

[systemd rulez]

Funny how moderator 'JS987' says that "He is only posting his opinions like anyone else. He can't sabotage forums this way" and also that he won't do anything about it because "People have right for different opinion. You can add him to ignore list".

So BSD user's ignore list must be very long.

Seriously, grow up

[Sergio]

Call me what ever you like, BSD zealot/troll/luser. Your the one and is the troll and I'm just telling what I researched.

Trolling at Phoronix? You mean people just talking about the truths about BSD and how shit it is? If you don't like that don't join phoronix forums. This forum from what I seen repects free speech. If you don't like that fuk off to BSD forums where they only allow you to post things they like (not even questions).

Come back here once you suck it up cry bitch.

If you want evidence that BSD steals GPL software look here: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/history-of-bsd/



and: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/


and also: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/02...bians-apt-get/

Funny how moderator 'JS987' says that "He is only posting his opinions like anyone else. He can't sabotage forums this way" and also that he won't do anything about it because "People have right for different opinion. You can add him to ignore list".

[systemd rulez]

I noticed that the blog you cited has no citations, furthermore the writing style is simplistic and biased, much like your own posts.
So I theorise that it was, in fact you, who wrote these articles.

That's a pathetic reason for thinking that I am those posts. It's more probably you're just trying to get me banned as I didn't talk good things about BSD. Why don't you just suck it up.

And besides, I don't have the time or endurance to write such long articles so those post are clearly not mine. It's more like a lot of poeple don't like BSD because it's shit.

So, show us proof for these claims or show us another, cited source, where people in the BSD community 'violate the GPL on a regular basis.'

Here: http://trl.ca/2007/04/theo-de-raadt-...gpl-violation/

On April 4, 2007, Linux software driver developer Michael Buesch revealed that other programmers working on the OpenBSD operating system had copied code licensed under GNU Public License v.2 (GPL), incorporated it into their own code, and released the result under the incompatible BSD license without asking permission. In addition to violating the terms of the GPL, which requires that the GPL license remain attached to any GPL?d code, OpenBSD?s actions have placed the open source code at risk to be used (and closed) by proprietary software vendors.

[intellivision]

Call me what ever you like, BSD zealot/troll/luser. Your the one and is the troll and I'm just telling what I researched.

Trolling at Phoronix? You mean people just talking about the truths about BSD and how shit it is? If you don't like that don't join phoronix forums. This forum from what I seen repects free speech. If you don't like that fuk off to BSD forums where they only allow you to post things they like (not even questions).

Come back here once you suck it up cry bitch.

If you want evidence that BSD steals GPL software look here: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/history-of-bsd/



and: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/


and also: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/02...bians-apt-get/

I noticed that the blog you cited has no citations, furthermore the writing style is simplistic and biased, much like your own posts.
So I theorise that it was, in fact you, who wrote these articles.
So, show us proof for these claims or show us another, cited source, where people in the BSD community 'violate the GPL on a regular basis.'

[systemd rulez]

Present some evidences before you call a whole community criminals, troll. Your trolling is still inferior to what Phoronix already has seen, learn more before you come back.

Call me what ever you like, BSD zealot/troll/luser. Your the one and is the troll and I'm just telling what I researched.

Trolling at Phoronix? You mean people just talking about the truths about BSD and how shit it is? If you don't like that don't join phoronix forums. This forum from what I seen repects free speech. If you don't like that fuk off to BSD forums where they only allow you to post things they like (not even questions).

Come back here once you suck it up cry bitch.

If you want evidence that BSD steals GPL software look here: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/history-of-bsd/

Back at Berkeley, supporters of Bill Joy?s idea continued to work on BSD mainly by taking code from the GNU project lead by Richard Stallman, removing the GPL and replacing it with their BSD license. By that time, the GNU was almost a complete OS (it still lacked a kernel). This actually gave BSD the ability to developed a full OS with minimum effort (yes that?s right BSD owes GNU a lot. Without GNU, BSD would not have existed which is really sad as GNU was made to free people while BSD or more correctly BDSM was made to enslave pean ople).

and: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/

Since, de Raadt has been in charge of the OpenBSD project which claim to ?produce some of the most secure code? while at the same time, taking GPL code to make into their own.

and also: http://antibsd.wordpress.com/2013/02...bians-apt-get/

By the way for those who don?t know what a jail is, jails are a feature originally designed by Linux developer Daniel Lezcano (the creator of LXC) which was then stolen by FreeBSD project member Poul Henning-Kamp to implement on FreeBSD. FreeBSD jails functions similarity to Linux chroots but are far more insecure.