Originally posted by jayrulez
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vote On A Distribution For Linux Benchmarking
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by verde View Postbla bla bla, there is absolutely no way the known statistics (distros share) legitimately change in a poll.
1. There is only one time zone
2. The distribution of distro users is consistent around the world
3. The distribution of distro users is consistent across age groups and professions (some people will be working when others aren't)
4. Users of different distros visit Phoronix with equal frequency on average
5. Users in different regions or different professions visit Phoronix with equal frequency on average.
1 and 2 are certainly false. 3 is almost certainly false. 4 and 5 are probably false.
Originally posted by verde View PostYou can like whatever you want but there is the "one person-one vote" rule and the Ubuntu "people" are more than Fedora "people" and the Fedora "people" are more than the Manjaro "people".
Originally posted by verde View PostSo the poll is not legitimate because statistics dont lie but they can be cheated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View PostStallman mate we all know very well ... Linus Torvalds instead said , "I believe that Ubuntu has taken the right approach, and it was very user-centric", then forget it. Do you know who this is Linus Torvalds? I think the issue of Linux are its users, who are at war not realizing that actually Linux on desktop DOES NOT EXIST!
Your statements "These words are the death of free software" and "this is the philosophy of free software" - so - are simply ridiculous, wrong and false.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jayrulez View PostDid you miss the sarcasm tag?
That's actually from Wayland or rather Weston... But I knew some idiot would claim it is ugly just because I said it is from Mir. It is the handle_setmaster function in this file: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...eston-launch.c
I just changed some names around to remove any hint that it is from Weston.
well the good news i checked most wayland code and is neat and goto free, so i suppose this was the kinda "is a toy code i don't care" i will report it as a bug either way in case someone wants to use weston for production later
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Postyes i did was 1 am my gmt when i replied but that in plain ISO C XX is tolerable and since weston is a toy i can understand is less rigid about this kind of stuff but when you put C++ i snapped seeing a goto
well the good news i checked most wayland code and is neat and goto free, so i suppose this was the kinda "is a toy code i don't care" i will report it as a bug either way in case someone wants to use weston for production later
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Postyes i did was 1 am my gmt when i replied but that in plain ISO C XX is tolerable and since weston is a toy i can understand is less rigid about this kind of stuff but when you put C++ i snapped seeing a goto
well the good news i checked most wayland code and is neat and goto free, so i suppose this was the kinda "is a toy code i don't care" i will report it as a bug either way in case someone wants to use weston for production later
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/connection.c 15 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-client.c 7 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/wayland-os.c 2 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-server.c 5 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/.../wayland-shm.c 3 instances
I don't think you needed to report a big for this as it is not really an issue with using goto as long as you use it properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jayrulez View PostI checked Wayland repo also and it seems that it uses goto more than Weston does.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/connection.c 15 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-client.c 7 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/wayland-os.c 2 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-server.c 5 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/.../wayland-shm.c 3 instances
I don't think you needed to report a big for this as it is not really an issue with using goto as long as you use it properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jayrulez View PostI checked Wayland repo also and it seems that it uses goto more than Weston does.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/connection.c 15 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-client.c 7 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...c/wayland-os.c 2 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/...yland-server.c 5 instances
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/.../wayland-shm.c 3 instances
I don't think you needed to report a big for this as it is not really an issue with using goto as long as you use it properly.Last edited by Akka; 01 August 2013, 11:45 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Akka View PostI think it is generally considered acceptable use of goto to use it in error management in c code? At least it is very common. I get the impression the use both in weston and wayland is this.
1.) char[] <-- will summon beelzebub to your house
2.) goto <-- will kill my dog
3.) union -- uint/char[] <-- will rupture space time continuum
and goto asm dump are ugly and sometimes insecure, im picky and pragmatic what can i say
Comment
Comment