Originally posted by Brane215
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Development Pace Of Systemd Fell Sharply This Year
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostDepends on the situation. For systemd, I would argue no, because that means less stupid crap being put in there that doesn't need to be put in. ... Meanwhile for something like the Linux kernel, a drop in commits could be a concern.Last edited by pal666; 30 December 2016, 03:07 PM.
Comment
-
Why would they send patches if they want anything done ? They could roll their own implementation.
And why should systemd any different in that regard than, say, Wayland ?
Wayland might be interesting for some mobile equipment industry, but it is developed with ordinary user in mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sethox View PostStupid Question:
Is it always better to have more commits than previous year?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postbecause kernel does need more stupid crap that doesn't need to be put in? are you on drugs?
I know you have a knack for being needlessly antagonistic and connecting dots that don't belong, but this is bad even for you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brane215 View PostWhy would they send patches if they want anything done ? They could roll their own implementation.
And why should systemd any different in that regard than, say, Wayland ?
I mean it's like saying "why should systemd be any different than say, openGL".
Of course everyone can have its own openGL or Wayland backend/compositor/whatever, as long as the same API is shown. But systemd isn't an API/protocol.
Wayland might be interesting for some mobile equipment industry, but it is developed with ordinary user in mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Duve View Post
For the moment, I don't really see anything in the land of Linux that will supplant systemd.
Not for the many benefits that it does give the user, and I get the feeling that anything that attempts to supplant it will likely have to take that into consideration.
I honestly doubt that one will materialize until it is likely that they can replicate most (if not all) of those said benefits.
Comment
Comment