Originally posted by Panix
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gnome kills KDE
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by acobar View PostI also hate the new menu. Why don't you use the classic one? It is what I do and I am completely satisfied with it.
Right click on your desktop or on "Application Menu Launcher" and select "Unlock Widgets". Right click again on it and select "Switch to Classic Menu Style". Done! May you want, right click on it again and customize what you would like to see on it. Enjoy!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostYou are third person claiming that a large horde of ghost hackers live in the feature branches but never leaves a finger print in the master branches. I took a resonable sample from the feature branches and had a look if those names also got picked up by Ohloh.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Honton View Posta few GSOC students? Ha the same thing goes on in GIMP. Have a look.
Originally posted by Honton View PostBesides even if all GSOC students did this it would not be enough to cover the amount of ghost hackers needed to claim that KDE is not dying.
Originally posted by Honton View PostNames please, not a few stalled GSOC projects!!!
Originally posted by Honton View PostKDE hides the Qt agreement on JPGs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostSo you take KDE's inability to merge GSOC project as a sign of succes? Very funny. I just gave you an example of GIMP's branches which shows Gnome also have some feature branches waiting to be merged. But nobody at Gnome would use that as an excuse to explain the loss of more than 100 contributor. It is only you and a few other who are this desperate
Originally posted by Honton View PostSo to sum it up. No names just a few cherrypicked references to a few branches. No explanation where the hundreds of ghost KDE hackers are hiding.
Originally posted by Honton View PostHaha, so you are saying this stops KDE from providing a clear text version and a FAQ?
Originally posted by Honton View PostYou said yourself you had an lawyer explain things for you.
Originally posted by Honton View PostKDE has FAILED to communicate about this. Most people are confused and believe Qt is fully covered, which is not true.
Originally posted by Honton View PostThis is sooo dishonest and KDE does nothing to make it better. And YOU are totally absent when people make misjudgements which makes KDE look more powerful. That is very wrong. And the links you provided earlier shows how dishonest everyone at KDE is about this. My posting got discussed because I tell what the agreement says. But no one at KDE reacts when confused people says Qt is fully covered.
But let's also face that right now the difference hardly matters. Except for the platform plugins the code is the same. So all that might be lost are the plugins for the proprietary platforms. Would be sad, but we all hope that the foundation will never have to execute the rights, don't we? I personally would not care if those plugins got lost as my software is X11/Wayland only and that's the only part to which I have ever contributed in Qt (c.f. to my saying that I don't have a problem with the CLA as my contributions are protected).
Comment
Comment