Originally posted by jntesteves
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adobe To Use TransGaming's SwiftShader; Remember Cedega?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by V!NCENT View PostOh yeah what a freaking change has that been <_<'
Get outa here, troll... Cocoa is a rename of the Unix cross platform API that came from NextStep. This universal API is now (freaking finaly) implemented on Linux in the form of GnuStep.
And, on a side note, Linux don't need no NextStep shit.
Leave a comment:
-
LOriginally posted by smitty3268 View PostAs someone who works with .NET at work, I can tell you that the API churn there is incredible. And I think everyone is aware of how often OSX has changed APIs and how difficult it has been to switch from Carbon to Cocoa. So i find complaints about Linux APIs changing too much to be a little humorous.
Get outa here, troll... Cocoa is a rename of the Unix cross platform API that came from NextStep. This universal API is now (freaking finaly) implemented on Linux in the form of GnuStep.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jntesteves View PostSorry if I wasn't clear on that. GCC is not an Apple project, of course, but they use it and they do contribute code back uptream.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by XorEaxEax View PostEhh, no GCC is definately NOT Apple's. Webkit is a fork of KHTML so it's not as if they created it from scratch, also LLVM is not made by Apple, although they are certainly the largest (only?) corporate contributor as it stands.
But LLVM, frankly, Apple is the one paying everybody that works on it fulltime. But big and core open-source projects like those don't "belong" to any single institution as they really shouldn't. Not like some other enterprises who think they can own open-source projects forever. (cough, sun, cough)
Apple (back in 2001!) started Webkit from KHTML's codebase, but, saying that today it IS KHTML with a couple Apple patches is far from truth. With help from Apple, Google and many independent contributors it became a bigger project. KHTML did the harder work of starting it all, but, today Webkit > KHTML.
Originally posted by XorEaxEax View PostAs for flash, I certainly have no love for it either. Here's hoping HTML5 and webm manages to wrestle away parts of flash's market. Open source based standards benefit competition, and competition brings better end products. Monopolies on the other hand sure as hell don't.
audio and video elements, audio API (FF4), SVG + SMIL, MathML, canvas element, WebGL (+ typed arrays as an very welcome extra), touch API, local storage, Indexed DB, @fonts, CSS transforms.
But a lot is still missing, like: audio and video input (mic, cam), miscellaneous input events (gamepad), video API.
We are getting there faster than the speed of light, thanks to Gecko's and Webkit's contributors.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jntesteves View PostLLVM, GCC and, most importantly, Webkit, which drove the web to compete at a whole new level of quality, speed and standards compliance.
As for flash, I certainly have no love for it either. Here's hoping HTML5 and webm manages to wrestle away parts of flash's market. Open source based standards benefit competition, and competition brings better end products. Monopolies on the other hand sure as hell don't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by devius View PostMaybe you didn't read this thread: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26436
Originally posted by devius View PostWell, Apple does make CUPS and is in charge of x.org server 1.9.
You know, as near as five years from now, most of our apps will be web based. So, that is the most important technology to put money on now. That's why Adobe won't give up Flash, ever.
Originally posted by devius View PostThe only real problem I have with flash right now is that it crashes at least 10 times every minute... or something like that. It also makes my netbook feel slower than a 486 with 4MB of ram running windows 7. It's also stupid to use vector animation software to display movies.
There's only one full implementation and it's proprietary and from a company that has a monopoly of almost all of the markets it competes on. Now THAT's a problem!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by V!NCENT View PostAdobe has always been Sony's Betamax and MiniDisc; deaperately trying to own the market with fonts and shit like Flash.
If they open source Flash then they can no longer de the sole creation vendor of Flash. Simple...
Adobe is as horrible as Microsoft!
Rather than bitch about it not being open..move on like everyone else is doing..html5 is catching on. Once youtube completely moves then it'll just be a matter of time because quite honestly that's the primary user of flash.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jntesteves View PostAt least, Apple and Oracle doesn't treat free software as public enemy.
(...)
While Microsoft still thinks open-source is the devil. (they just don't admit it publicly anymore, but they still think it, I know)
Well, Apple does make CUPS and is in charge of x.org server 1.9. The only real problem I have with flash right now is that it crashes at least 10 times every minute... or something like that. It also makes my netbook feel slower than a 486 with 4MB of ram running windows 7. It's also stupid to use vector animation software to display movies.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: