Originally posted by Paradigm Shifter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
XZ Struck By Malicious Code That Could Allow Unauthorized Remote System Access
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 3
-
Originally posted by LightBit View Post
So it must be (developed and distributed and signed off) or just distributed "directly"?
I'm sure you will keep changing rules so that Microsoft never had backdoor and backdoors are limited to open source.
No proof of backdoor in Windows does not proof there is no backdoor in Windows.
It would be best to assume everything is potentialy backdoored.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by carewolf View Post
And what made me extremely sceptical of everyhing rust, once I relealised it works the same way when using the default cargo build system. It can be super secure, but having an automated default attack vector like that is a huge red flag. Why is insecurity the latest trend in programming languages?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Companies like Microsoft and Google are using FLOSS software in their infrastructure, this is not an exploit specific to the linux desktop or individual consumer choice, the target is obviously the vast majority of cloud infrastructure.
It's just a sign of the times that these things happen, it's easier than getting rogue employees into companies but you can be sure that's happening as well now that the relationship between the US and China has turned openly adversarial, and more than just the open software ecosystem you can't forget we live in an open society that depends on highly skilled workers from China.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by LightBit View Post
You have to also consider there are much more Windows users that are not tech savy and do not even know how to Google for solution. They might not even know updates were installed.
Windows errors are highly publicized and lots of mainstream portals write about them and create discussions under them. Unlike Linux where about its bugs mainstream media is silent.
Many Linux users are essentially running development versions on custom configuration that is not even possible on Windows.
I have/had many programmer friends who use/used Linux and used stable versions. Very many of them have switched to macOS in recent years. But that's my environment (large company) and doesn't necessarily translate to other companies or individuals. Do you have any data?
Comment
-
Originally posted by avis View Post
Have fun with Open Source "security" and keep peddling imaginary backdoors in Windows. Please next time start your messages with "I firmly believe Windows is full of backdoors". It will allow people to easily identity you as a zealot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LightBit View Post
This is far from anything I said and think.
How do you know if a particular vulnerability in Linux was not created on purpose???? Why do you make the assumption that always these vulnerabilities are due to oversight, accident, negligence????
Do you have any proof of this???
Comment
-
Originally posted by HEL88 View Post
That's why they ask google what to do, rather than start fixing it themselves like Linux users.
Originally posted by HEL88 View Post
??? Windows Insider have 10 000 000 active users (official data from a few years ago). And you have any reliable data on how many Linux users are using it in the development version?
I have/had many programmer friends who use/used Linux and used stable versions. Very many of them have switched to macOS in recent years. But that's my environment (large company) and doesn't necessarily translate to other companies or individuals. Do you have any data?
Personally I usually find bugs on Linux easier to workaround, but that is just my subjetive preference.
Comment
Comment