Sorry if this is not the right place to ask.
I'm in the process of changing job and I'm the main developer of some libraries (ports from C/C++ to Jvm/Kotlin). They were developed primarly under the company, but also in my free time. Their scope goes beyond the company.
Most of them are MIT, 2 Apache-2.0 and one BSD-3-Clause and I have a Patreon page for one of them, (the most personal time consuming one)
I signed something translatable as
Said that I have absolutely no problem continuining letting them use/work them, does this may open the door to some potentially unethical actions? Does this ensure both parties?
I'm in the process of changing job and I'm the main developer of some libraries (ports from C/C++ to Jvm/Kotlin). They were developed primarly under the company, but also in my free time. Their scope goes beyond the company.
Most of them are MIT, 2 Apache-2.0 and one BSD-3-Clause and I have a Patreon page for one of them, (the most personal time consuming one)
I signed something translatable as
Mr. X also confirms that he has granted the company an irrevocable, temporally and spatially unlimited, transferable right to exploit the works created by him in the context of or in the event of the employment relationship being protected by copyright, including software the processing includes, whereby the obligation to name the copyright is waived. The company has the exclusive rights to the code, Mr. X will not hear of any use for his own or third-party purposes. The provisions of the Employee Invention Act remain unaffected
Said that I have absolutely no problem continuining letting them use/work them, does this may open the door to some potentially unethical actions? Does this ensure both parties?
Comment