Originally posted by Vim_User
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The State Of Killing CONFIG_VT, Moving To User-Space
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ericg View PostWhats busybox gonna do when udev is moved back in kernel? Seems like that would conflict with mdev at that point...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teho View PostHow could udev possibly be moved "back" in to the kernel? It's userspace daemon with various dependencies like glibc and kmod. If someone were to fork systemd-udev it would really make no difference. systemd based distributions would still use systemd-udev, Android would still use their implementation and nothing would change for mdev ...and who exactly is supposed to maintain this alleged udev fork? It seems all major udev developers very a-ok with the systemd merge.All opinions are my own not those of my employer if you know who they are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ericg View Postback is bad wording on my part, but the topic of in-kernel udev came up back when the topic of in-kernel dbus came up. I don't know what ever came from that discussion (it was a dev who brought it up), I'm trying to track it down now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teho View PostHow could udev possibly be moved "back" in to the kernel? It's userspace daemon with various dependencies like glibc and kmod. If someone were to fork systemd-udev it would really make no difference. systemd based distributions would still use systemd-udev, Android would still use their implementation and nothing would change for mdev ...and who exactly is supposed to maintain this alleged udev fork? It seems all major udev developers very a-ok with the systemd merge.
Comment
Comment