AMD Radeon HD 6450

[LinuxID10T]

"Hopefully the AMD Radeon HD 7450 will be a more compelling product..."

this is the last lowend card ... because amd wana play lowend stuff with the "fusion"-APU line.

the 7xxx lowend card get at minimum gddr5 and the 8000 lowend cards get XDR2 vram...

Yeah, as much as I hate to agree with Q here, I can definitely see this as being a problem. Product placement wise, why the hell would a company put out a chip that is slower than the CPU integrated ones? It makes absolutely no damn sense. It would be kinda interesting to see if switching to a faster memory would result in better results, although, I believe they already produce the 6450 in a GDDR5 version. Where the memory is concerned, it would probably give it the most performance to finally ditch the 64-bit bus on their lowest end GPU and move them all to at least 128-bit.

[Wielkie G]

It's Caicos, and not Calcos.

[curaga]

The same happens on Opera & the png version of the same table.

[smitty3268]

This Radeon HD 6450 review also happens to one of the first articles using the new OpenBenchmarking.org embedded graphs, so feedback is welcome if you experience any difficulties viewing the results.

The result graphs displayed fine, but there is an issue with the first table on page 3. Same thing happened on both Firefox and Chrome.

The width of the image is much wider than the width the article allows, and it gets cut off to the right.

[phoronix]

Phoronix: AMD Radeon HD 6450

While we have reviewed several graphics cards from AMD's Radeon HD 6000 series, one of the GPUs in this latest family that we have not benchmarked previously is the Radeon HD 6450. The AMD Radeon HD 6450 is the lowest-end offering in this family, but how's its performance relative to other low-end AMD and NVIDIA parts? In this review we have a PowerColor Radeon HD 6450 1GB and are seeing how well this graphics card works under Ubuntu Linux.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16396