Originally posted by zoomblab
View Post
But the reality is even worse than that, not only is as far as google trends at least suggest xfce the clear market leader still (but declining) and of course 50 other DEs out now since canonical backstabbed gnome, or likely at least partially because of it.
More choice sounds good and to some degree it is, but choice also comes at a cost, not only are linux beginners confused but you have then 2 or 20 half done desktops that are both worse than they could be if all would concentrate on one side.
So your argument that kde is good just because it's a alternative don't fly to well with me having a desktop alternative that is especially incompatible (different foundation) creates more fraction and doubles more work.
It sounds to me that at least to some degree you would use / advocate for kde because it's a alternative and not because you think it's the better of the 2, as some sort of principle that you want to always use the underdog or something, which makes not much sense I would arge the other desktops are better because they use the same libraries that makes it possible to have more cooperation.
Less fraction is a good thing, not a bad thing.
Leave a comment: