Originally posted by RobbieAB
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2008 Linux Graphics Survey Results
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eragon View PostHow can people keep saying linux is not suited for "normal" users if 56% of it's users describe themselves as "mainstream users"??
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostMy understanding was that KMS needed memory management (GEM/TTM), DRI2 also needed memory management but KMS did not need DRI2. They will probably arrive at more or less the same time, however, since they both become possible as soon as memory management is available, and both are considered really high priority by the developers.
EDIT - bah, ASCII diagram didn't work ;(
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KDesk View PostBut... KMS needs DRI2, so, the pool was wrong. It should have been DRI2 or KMS (and DRI2) and the other options also.
EDIT - bah, ASCII diagram didn't work ;(Last edited by bridgman; 23 December 2008, 01:07 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
What are you looking for in it? If the system can automagically deal with having a projector plugged in (this requires a reasonable amount of magic) it makes selling Linux as a laptop OS to business people who expect to make presentations a lot easier. If the projector has to be configured by tweaking xorg.conf, and restarting, you do not have a business laptop OS.
That magic is XRandR, it may need driver help, but to say it is just a matter for the proprietry drivers to catch up is nonsense as, IIRC, openChrome is an open source driver.
To push Linux on laptops, you needs automagic and effortless multi-monitor support, you need hot-plugable displays, and you need all this to be completely invisible to the user. Windows has done it for years, as has MacOS. Linux has "innovated" with eye-candy instead...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fart_flower View PostThat's just your theory. I have my own.
That's not my theory at all. It's fact that despite best intentions and planning thing don't always go as well as expected. Until actual implementation is actually out there and performing as well as expected it's pure speculation.Last edited by deanjo; 23 December 2008, 12:20 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
In my mind, xrandr was in "Display-related features". Considering it's mostly waiting for all proprietary drivers to pick up, it's more in "What do you expect in proprietary drivers" than "What are you most interested in Xorg".
Whatever xrandr does, as long as the drivers don't support it there's not much point. And seeing how users don't really use the graphic card tool to configure their setup, you'd say it would make sense for the drivers publisher to implement xrandr support a bit faster.
Leave a comment:
-
But... KMS needs DRI2, so, the pool was wrong. It should have been DRI2 or KMS (and DRI2) and the other options also.
Leave a comment:
-
What bothered me slightly was the lack of an option to vote for XRandR. As a laptop user, it is more interesting to me than pretty much anything else bar stability, as projectors and external monitors are an important part of using a mobile laptop in any kind of business environment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostIn "theory", and we all know that theory doesn't necessarily mean that real-life execution will reflect that.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: