If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The State Of Wayland Support With KDE Frameworks 5, Plasma Next
I don't get where people got the idea that the first release of Plasma Next will have fully wayland support. Sure, they have been working on it, but the developers never claimed, or even implied, it would be ready right away.
Martin wrote in October 2012:
?starting from January I will join Blue Systems for working on KWin. [?] I want to use this chance to work on bringing KWin to the world of Wayland.?
Very soon after joining the KWin development team almost five years ago, I realized that KWin would need at least one full time developer. It is one of the most important parts for the user experie…
So IMHO he did imply that he would work full time on Wayland support for KWin in 2013. Priorities shifted when all Blue Systems programmers decided to focus on KF5, which is nothing bad (on the contrary, it is great!), but claiming that Martin never gave the impression of Wayland support coming really early (even though he may have never stated an exact version number), is not true either.
Wayland and Weston works.
I have these programs installed in my Gentoo box. For the moment I'm able to run evince, gedit, gnumeric and transmission-remote-gtk from my installed graphical software.
My other programs, abiword, chromium, firefox, qgis etc doesn't work because of developers who didn't ported yet.
Before 2015 I'll be using more Wayland then X11 I think. Need mainly mplayer and firefox or chromium to be ported first since I use much them.
$ weston-launch for you!
There is Chromium port to Wayland already using ozone-wayland. As for mplayer, you might wanna take a look at mpv - fork of both mplayer and mplayer2 that supports wayland out of the box. As for Firefox, that's a long way to go even when GTK+3 port gets completed.
Martin wrote in October 2012:
“starting from January I will join Blue Systems for working on KWin. […] I want to use this chance to work on bringing KWin to the world of Wayland.”
Very soon after joining the KWin development team almost five years ago, I realized that KWin would need at least one full time developer. It is one of the most important parts for the user experie…
So IMHO he did imply that he would work full time on Wayland support for KWin in 2013. Priorities shifted when all Blue Systems programmers decided to focus on KF5, which is nothing bad (on the contrary, it is great!), but claiming that Martin never gave the impression of Wayland support coming really early (even though he may have never stated an exact version number), is not true either.
About a year ago i estimated in these forums that Wayland in KDE would be ready around spring 2015. Martin replied to my post and basically said i had no clue what i was talking about and it would be sooner than that, though he wouldn't go into any details about when he thought it would happen.
I'm feeling pretty good about that spring 2015 estimate right now.
And for those who think the Free Qt foundation is nothing but a lawyer's prank. Wayland is not even covered. Just like win, qnx, mac and so on. Anyway that might not matter since Free Qt foundation does not cover Qt only "Qt Free Edition".
Can you read the files LICENSE.GPL, LICENSE.LGPL ????
Don't even try. It's a troll and ignores every fact you tell him. For the record members of the Free-Qt Foundation recently sent a detailed mail to the kde-community mailing list due to Honton's trolling. It knows that, it knows that the mail also addressed his Wayland concerns. But it will ride the CLA bullshit as long as it wants. It ignores everything which got explained to him especially that the restriction on a platform is nowadays pointless. But it fits its trolling. Put it on ignore list and have a happy day.
WTell us, does KDE gain any rights to relicense the entire Qt or is it only covering the already free licensed version for a very limited number of platforms?
Stop lying. The entire Qt is under a free license and you know it. There is not a single line of code different between the free and non-free versions.
Comment