I saw what it said. It was a little unclear at first, because of course we have this in the article: "The set of patches are needed for supporting Mir's EGL platform in mainline Mesa." We have about as much reason to trust Canonical as we do Microsoft. Over the years, they have proven themselves to be only takers. They are ready to take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take take from the community, but pathes from them are about as rare as rain in the Sahara.
*IF* this is true that the patches are beneficial to all, instead of just Canonical, then sure. But that's up to the Mesa developers to decide.
Maybe tonight its going to rain................... But I'm not holding my breath. You know the old saying:
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me"
*IF* this is true that the patches are beneficial to all, instead of just Canonical, then sure. But that's up to the Mesa developers to decide.
Maybe tonight its going to rain................... But I'm not holding my breath. You know the old saying:
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me"
Comment