Originally posted by phoen1x
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A Note To Canonical: "Don't Piss On Wayland"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by nightmarex View PostIDK maybe I'm just old but I always though a panel with a application launch button (perhaps a clock in corner) is easier for most new users to understand then a bunch of wierd buttons and menus ui. Kind of why Metro caught flack wasn't it?
Comment
-
I?m sure Canonical will still make Wayland available. It is possible to do a minimal Ubuntu installation, and then choose the programs you want, instead of going with the programs that are included in the typical installation. I?ve done that before, since I prefer LXDE to Unity, VLC to Totem, etc. If they decide to not offer Wayland, I might have to consider going back to Arch. What keeps me coming back to Ubuntu is their package management.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 123_qwe View PostTechnically Wayland is probably better, however that alone does not grant it success. Ubuntu is probably the only commercially viable implementation of Linux on the destkop. When was the last time that <insert favourite distro> appeared on BBC, CNN, etc?
In the long run they will probably do with Mir and they did with Compiz( support it, launch it, and in the end revert to QT) and support Wayland. If NVIDIA launches drivers for Mir won't that benefit Wayland too (EGL). I can see the reasoning for Mir.
tricked into marketing they did not the see Canonical real purpose, control. I personally despite Canonical perversion of Ubuntu name and their brag of inventing elements where they did barely contribute to the FOSS community.
Canonical still has not made a single profit in consumer desktop despite popularity and it shows there are bad financial decision on their hand. In business point of view,Ubuntu is a laughing stock. Meanwhile, watching Canonical doing its own downfall.
Comment
-
Originally posted by phoen1x View PostBecause those patches are trivial.
YEAH RIGHT
Or, more easier, where would we have been without Ubuntu? Oh yeah, Gnome Shell would have surely attracted a lot of new users
If u are retard then yes, every other DE/WM whatever will be hard for u to understand. Those so called new users don't even understand what's the difference between windows and ubuntu(i don;t say linux coz those tards don;t even know what is linux). They see all those fancy window animations and they say"HEY THATS UBAH KEWL, UBUNTU RULEZ WINDOWS SUCKS". Most of their problems are " I pressed something now there is this <insert random stupid bs> problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by phoen1x View PostThere should be some GPL changes to disallow faggots from canonical use damn code for free. PERIOD.
Mir will probably fail on it's own, but it will do damage to the ecosystem before it's done.
Comment
-
Originally posted by e8hffff View PostNvidia did say they were not going to support Wayland. If support comes then Wayland has a chance, else it's a struggling project.
Mir on the other hand will be too tempting for Nvidia to push aside.
If drivers fragmentation will happen - it will be horrible especially gaming wise. It'll hinder any positive developments which start to emerge now.Last edited by shmerl; 05 March 2013, 03:07 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by scionicspectre View PostWhilst this may be the most important time to support Canonical, it may also be the most important time to boycott them. Unfortunately, if the community comes together to decry Canonical's dubious technical and ethical decisions, the software industry at large may take it as another sign of our immaturity and inability to work together in a unified way. In fact, Canonical seems the be the only person who has a problem with this, but we get the blame for being too dogmatic.
It's utter B.S., and I can't wait until we get past this idiocy.
And phoen1x, even when I agree with you I do not want to be seen in the same room with you. Try calming down and being a bit more eloquent with your posts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by alexThunder View PostBesides the questions, if this applies to all of their patches, is triviality a reason to reject?
Which distro got, by far, the most users? Which distro is actually getting the people from other OSs mostly? Which distro do proprietary applications target first?
Or, more easier, where would we have been without Ubuntu? Oh yeah, Gnome Shell would have surely attracted a lot of new users
Then you have to assume, that most people are retarded. Still, that doesn't help if other companies like Microsoft and Apple catch them and get so many users, that they can close up everything towards the outside world. Guess who's then left behind (we're just slowly getting out of this mess, thanks to whom again?).
Originally posted by Hamish WilsonAnd phoen1x, even when I agree with you I do not want to be seen in the same room with you. Try calming down and being a bit more eloquent with your posts.
Comment
Comment