Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Early Out Of Tree Patches Let Wine Run Natively On Wayland
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cybertraveler View PostThat's interesting stuff, but doesn't disprove (or support) Starship's point.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThat's the direction Wine has taken lately. Who uses productiivity software anyway, right? 'AIGHT?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
You have not been reading the wine release announcements.
3DAnalyzer is a cad thing for wood working.
MSYS2 compilers and stuff.
MindManager Pro one of those mind mapping things
Speccy computer specs thing. Logos 8 bible study stuff. I would say more games stuff is happening but. There are some insanely wacky things that turn up every release announcement so productivity stuff does turn up..
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThat's the direction Wine has taken lately. Who uses productiivity software anyway, right? 'AIGHT?
- Likes 5
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThat's the direction Wine has taken lately. Who uses productiivity software anyway, right? 'AIGHT?
3DAnalyzer is a cad thing for wood working.
MSYS2 compilers and stuff.
MindManager Pro one of those mind mapping things
Speccy computer specs thing. Logos 8 bible study stuff. I would say more games stuff is happening but. There are some insanely wacky things that turn up every release announcement so productivity stuff does turn up..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cybertraveler View PostIt looks like this is currently entirely game software focused so far.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostI'd be curious to see the performance differences of WINE through X, xwayland, and Wayland. For something that is already adding more CPU usage than normal, I figure going straight to Wayland ought to yield some improvement on low-end systems.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
The reality is Wine though x.org on direct hardware or Xwayland on top of wayland compositor as long as both have proper GPU support the performance difference is basically nothing. Its not adding more CPU usage x.org vs Xwayland because Xwayland cuts away a hell load of sub system stuff due to using wayland protocol so wayland compostors + Xwayland are equal or lighter than x.org on direct hardware on cpu and ram usage.
Wine direct on Wayland may give some improvement but the question is how much has to be re-implemented of what Xwayland does to make windows applications happy.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostI'd be curious to see the performance differences of WINE through X, xwayland, and Wayland. For something that is already adding more CPU usage than normal, I figure going straight to Wayland ought to yield some improvement on low-end systems.
Also...
It'd be kinda funny to run the Windows version of Chrome in Wayland, whereas you can't do that with Linux (yes, I know about Ozone...)
Leave a comment:
-
I'd be curious to see the performance differences of WINE through X, xwayland, and Wayland. For something that is already adding more CPU usage than normal, I figure going straight to Wayland ought to yield some improvement on low-end systems.
Also...
It'd be kinda funny to run the Windows version of Chrome in Wayland, whereas you can't do that with Linux (yes, I know about Ozone...)
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: