Originally posted by asdx
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The S3TC Patent Might Be Invalid
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Nevertime View PostAre you arguing semantics? I don't see your point. I've already stated that its how you source your information from all the mediums available. It sounds like we're in agreement.
I was bashing that which you were arguing against
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yogi_berra View PostYes, the internet has made quality investigative journalism like that which led to Woodward and Burnstein's Watergate articles next to impossible as there is no funding for it.
Politics and current events are covered now at a speed and quantity that eclipse the past. A decline in investigative journalism is counterbalanced with something that's not the same but does mean your aware as ever (quite possibly more so) of the corruption that grips the world. I understand america is politicly a little messed up with groups like the tea party showing how ignorant people can be but I would suggest they're people who don't want to fact check what their spoon fed. For people who seek it, access to news isn't largely restricted to a limited number of media mogul's any more. As long as you have the ability to identify reliable sources and cross reference effectively you don't have to take the word of any journalist. You can often quickly be able to look into aspects their claim yourself. How often have you, for example, been watching a documentary on misc troubles in a far off country and popped onto Google to get further information for yourself mid show? The internet empowers you if you use it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nevertime View PostDo you think people were better informed before the internet?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by V!NCENT View Post+1000 internets.
The word wide web is a medium, not a fscking place to get info from.
All traditional ways of information, like Science magazine, newspapers; they are all online too. It's what source of information you look at.
Thinking of the internet as a source is just as stupid as classiying paper as a source, or sound >.<
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nevertime View PostBut the idea that the internet hasn't been a fantastic source of information for people who can use it properly is frankly retarded. Do you think people were better informed before the internet? Don't worry your not patronizing your just embarrassing.
The word wide web is a medium, not a fscking place to get info from.
All traditional ways of information, like Science magazine, newspapers; they are all online too. It's what source of information you look at.
Thinking of the internet as a source is just as stupid as classiying paper as a source, or sound >.<
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Azpegath View PostYou need just need to read this: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apostrophe
That's education in a box.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nevertime View PostOf course there is misinformation and misinformed people online that's what this whole convo has been about. But the idea that the internet hasn't been a fantastic source of information for people who can use it properly is frankly retarded. Do you think people were better informed before the internet? Don't worry your not patronizing your just embarrassing.
That's education in a box.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yogi_berra View PostIt makes me feel patronizing to have to have to say that the internet has not done a single damned thing to create an informed populace, just ask Shirley Sherrod.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Nevertime View PostIf anything now we have the web many people are more aware of the factual inaccuracies that was always there in all media.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: