Originally posted by agd5f
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by dungeon; 13 October 2014, 07:49 PM.
-
Originally posted by agd5f View PostEveryone seems to keep asking the same question, but ignoring my response. Let's try this again: Having a shared components benefits both drivers since there will be more developers working on those components. We will now have a number of formerly closed source developers working on new open source components in additional to the open source developers. It doesn't matter what userspace graphics stack is running when you light up the displays or set up the power management hardware. Having more developers to help write and maintain and debug that code helps everyone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by droste View PostI think everyone but dungeon got that it's a good thing
It doesn't matter what userspace graphics stack is running when you light up the displays or set up the power management hardware.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View Postslightly corrected, so if does not matter why keeping it both? Drop non-pro, invest more in opensource one, plug in only firepro and everybody will be happy - including me
Still, I'm expecting the blob to become even less important in the next years...
Comment
-
I wonder... will AMDGPU use LLVM? If it does, hopefully AMD is working on it, because otherwise, it would take some time to improve it, at least judging by the kind of stuff seen with radeonsi. Having to wait a year to have good driver support is not something one would want or expect. Also, in the same topic, what about OpenCL support? Will there be more devs working in the open source implementation?
And, unrelated, what about current OpenCL support for Radeon?
Originally posted by dungeon View PostBut slightly corrected, so if does not matter why keeping it both? Drop non-pro, invest more in opensource one, plug in only firepro and everybody will be happy - including me
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostBut slightly corrected, so if does not matter why keeping it both? Drop non-pro, invest more in opensource one, plug in only firepro and everybody will be happy - including me
The non-pro version exists now because people today rely on the Catalyst driver for GL4, OpenCL2, etc. work that the open driver does not yet provide.
He pretty much flat out said they'd like to get rid of the remaining Catalyst blob on linux, it's just that Mesa isn't quite there yet and so they have to keep their current customers happy.
Comment
-
I am confused why is dungeon so against this move as the AMD is doing what he wish for, dropping closed source drivers for their cards.
The closed-source kernel and DDX drivers will not exist for the new cards in catalyst.
Catalyst will be reduced to 3D Graphics + Video Decode/Encode Library, same as Mesa (The Mesa 3D Graphics Library).
- There will be no closed-source drivers for AMD cards on linux for new cards.
- AMD will have to start supporting their cards before release, same as Intel.
- The drivers will have to work reliably if they dont want to loose workstation market.
- Drivers can be ported to other OSes , like BSD and Opensolaris, and to other ISAs, like ARM and MIPS, as it is all open-source.
I see this as a big +
Comment
-
Originally posted by drSeehas View PostWill AMD cooperate with the *BSDs and (Open-)Solaris, so we will have a choice (today only nVIDIA) there in the future?
Then again with the increased manpower working on the kernel drivers AMD just might. Regardless within a few years (I'm not familiar enough with the efforts to make a real guess at the timeframe) AMD will be available as a proper choice.
Comment
Comment