Originally posted by tildearrow
View Post
Besides, would you really expect their proposed design to be accepted immediately by the DRI/DRM guys without *any* comment, without anyone raising concerns, or asking for clarification about why they've made certain decisions? There's no drama going on here... it's just the usual process of collaboratively evolving a design. As far as I can figure, the responses basically amount to "this aspect of the design would force us to break API compatibility in KMS... what's the justification for that?"
Leave a comment: