Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Iris Graphics 5100: Windows 8.1 vs. Ubuntu 14.04 Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • anemusek
    replied
    Originally posted by Panix View Post
    How come "Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4400 Are Great" but HD Graphics 4600 aren't? What's so different? ....
    Memory? Too fast to be faster ;P

    Leave a comment:


  • Panix
    replied
    Originally posted by anemusek View Post
    But is still open question - how intel os drivers work on other distros (other kernel&xorg&sof compilation and configuration)?
    How come "Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4400 Are Great" but HD Graphics 4600 aren't? What's so different? Also, has there been any benchmarks/comparisons of Intel graphics with AMD APU?

    Leave a comment:


  • anemusek
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    See the 6 way benchmarks from earlier in the week.... Unity and compiz no longer have the overhead they once did.
    But is still open question - how intel os drivers work on other distros (other kernel&xorg&sof compilation and configuration)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by johnp View Post
    Michael, I think it will be useful to provide benchmark results, using Lubuntu, or Xubuntu with its compositor (special effects) disabled.

    To disable the compositor in Xubuntu, you may go to Settings->Settings Manager->Window Manager Tweaks->Compositor->Enable display compositing.

    From my experience, one gets the maximum framerate with LXDE and XFCE (with the compositor disabled), on Linux.

    Compiz of Unity, etc, reduce performance.

    Also, by uninstalling, or disabling buntu's apport (crash reporting tool), programs start faster, and probably run faster.

    To disable apport:

    sudo nano /etc/default/apport:

    enabled=0

    and then, reboot.

    So, I think some benchmarks with Lubuntu, or Xubuntu (with the compositor disabled), would be interesting.
    See the 6 way benchmarks from earlier in the week.... Unity and compiz no longer have the overhead they once did.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnp
    replied
    Michael, I think it will be useful to provide benchmark results, using Lubuntu, or Xubuntu with its compositor (special effects) disabled.

    To disable the compositor in Xubuntu, you may go to Settings->Settings Manager->Window Manager Tweaks->Compositor->Enable display compositing.

    From my experience, one gets the maximum framerate with LXDE and XFCE (with the compositor disabled), on Linux.

    Compiz of Unity, etc, reduce performance.

    Also, by uninstalling, or disabling buntu's apport (crash reporting tool), programs start faster, and probably run faster.

    To disable apport:

    sudo nano /etc/default/apport:

    enabled=0

    and then, reboot.

    So, I think some benchmarks with Lubuntu, or Xubuntu (with the compositor disabled), would be interesting.
    Last edited by johnp; 14 March 2014, 03:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by zanny View Post
    Wouldn't the Blender movie projects work? I know most of them are mirrored all over the place. I just checked Sintel and it has 3 mirrors off the main site for the 4k version.
    I used to use big buck bunny but ran into a problem with it and it's mirrors. Trying to recall now.

    Leave a comment:


  • zanny
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    Tests will only be done if within PTS. It can be automated and have such test profiles already but only with poor quality video files.... Not enough good very high quality free videos that are http/FTP mirrored well, etc.
    Wouldn't the Blender movie projects work? I know most of them are mirrored all over the place. I just checked Sintel and it has 3 mirrors off the main site for the 4k version.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by DanL View Post
    @Michael:
    I'd love to see a good article comparing VA-API usage on the different Haswell GPU's (even if it's just a subjective opinion devoid of PTS benchmarks and Windows comparison). All of these articles on Intel HD graphics just have 3D/game benchmarks which don't paint a very clear picture for prospective buyers looking at HTPC-friendly hardware.

    In addition to GT1, GT2,and GT3/e chips, it would be nice to have your NUC unit and an IvyBridge chip thrown in to the review.
    Tests will only be done if within PTS. It can be automated and have such test profiles already but only with poor quality video files.... Not enough good very high quality free videos that are http/FTP mirrored well, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • curaga
    replied
    Originally posted by Azrael5 View Post
    I have still problems on getting a valid corresponding of a simple program as paint which makes easy operations in easy way (as resizing on cutting picture), it's absurd.
    I recommend mtPaint.

    Leave a comment:


  • DanL
    replied
    @Michael:
    I'd love to see a good article comparing VA-API usage on the different Haswell GPU's (even if it's just a subjective opinion devoid of PTS benchmarks and Windows comparison). All of these articles on Intel HD graphics just have 3D/game benchmarks which don't paint a very clear picture for prospective buyers looking at HTPC-friendly hardware.

    In addition to GT1, GT2,and GT3/e chips, it would be nice to have your NUC unit and an IvyBridge chip thrown in to the review.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X