Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Aims For Open-Source OpenGL 3.0 Driver By Year's End

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AlbertP
    replied
    It seems like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA does not contain the hardware support for GL / DX, but the highest version supported by the drivers.

    And it was that page where I got my info about GL & DX support.

    Leave a comment:


  • elanthis
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
    That's wrong. Ivy Bridge supports DX11 and GL4 in hardware. What you may be referring to is that the Windows OpenGL driver only supports OpenGL 3.1, but that has everything to do with how much effort Intel has put into that driver, and nothing to do with the actual hardware. Sandy Bridge can support the full GL 3.3 as well. I'm not sure about some of their older chips, but I think the G45 is also capable of 3.3.
    Yup. Sucks, too. Some Intel IGPs that run full DX10 often only support GL2.0 because Intel hates puppies, kittens, bunnies, and ducklings. Not that OpenGL is used much of anywhere in the first place, but it's just one of the many reasons why anyone outside of spreadsheet-addicted business users are strongly urged to get an NVIDIA or AMD GPU.

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by AlbertP View Post
    G45 aka Eaglelake/Cantiga supports up to OpenGL 2.1 in hardware. You won't get OpenGL 3.0 on this.

    Sandy Bridge was the first Intel chipset to support OpenGL 3.1 in hardware. OpenGL 3.2 at Intel will come in 2013 with the release of the Haswell CPU. Yet-to-be-released Ivy Bridge still supports OpenGL 3.1 only.
    That's wrong. Ivy Bridge supports DX11 and GL4 in hardware. What you may be referring to is that the Windows OpenGL driver only supports OpenGL 3.1, but that has everything to do with how much effort Intel has put into that driver, and nothing to do with the actual hardware. Sandy Bridge can support the full GL 3.3 as well. I'm not sure about some of their older chips, but I think the G45 is also capable of 3.3.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertP
    replied
    Originally posted by Drago View Post
    Why do they claim DX11 then?
    According to the official specification, Cantiga/Eaglelake supports DX10. DX11 support is introduced with Ivy Bridge.

    Perhaps Microsoft have written some software fallbacks to run DX11 programs on DX10 hardware.

    Leave a comment:


  • darkbasic
    replied
    Originally posted by AlbertP View Post
    Yet-to-be-released Ivy Bridge still supports OpenGL 3.1 only.
    OMG really? I thinked it was OpenGL 3.3 at least

    Leave a comment:


  • marek
    replied
    DX11 also supports all the DX10 hw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drago
    replied
    Originally posted by AlbertP View Post
    G45 aka Eaglelake/Cantiga supports up to OpenGL 2.1 in hardware. You won't get OpenGL 3.0 on this.

    Sandy Bridge was the first Intel chipset to support OpenGL 3.1 in hardware. OpenGL 3.2 at Intel will come in 2013 with the release of the Haswell CPU. Yet-to-be-released Ivy Bridge still supports OpenGL 3.1 only.
    Why do they claim DX11 then?

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertP
    replied
    G45 aka Eaglelake/Cantiga supports up to OpenGL 2.1 in hardware. You won't get OpenGL 3.0 on this.

    Sandy Bridge was the first Intel chipset to support OpenGL 3.1 in hardware. OpenGL 3.2 at Intel will come in 2013 with the release of the Haswell CPU. Yet-to-be-released Ivy Bridge still supports OpenGL 3.1 only.

    Leave a comment:


  • Azpegath
    replied
    Originally posted by Kayden View Post
    Yep. We're definitely planning on it.
    I love you. I just wanted to say that. I love you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kayden
    replied
    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    That's very good news. I hope that they continue working on GLSL after that, since that's the major problem with OpenGL 3.0 - 3.3.
    Yep. We're definitely planning on it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X