Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel's New Brand For High Performance Discrete Graphics: Arc

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • skeevy420
    replied
    Originally posted by M@GOid View Post

    There is no friction in a Arc dude. As a welder you should know that.

    /s
    Until your lead or wire touches (safety glasses)

    Leave a comment:


  • torsionbar28
    replied
    Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
    As a welder, Lincoln is the Arc brand I normally think of
    As an old DEC guy, to me ARC is the firmware you run on an Alpha when you want to boot Win NT. Dumb marketing name for a Gfx card either way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr. Righteous
    replied
    *Yawn*
    Man oh man. How long as it been that Intel has been promising a graphics solution to compete with AMD and Nvidia?
    Waiting on benchmarks........................

    Leave a comment:


  • sdack
    replied
    What an informative video! 0% misinformation, 100% uncertainty on what I have actually seen, and sure do I want to watch it again! Best 19 seconds of my life.

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
    hopefully, Intel will help alleviate the shortage by having competing products not produced by TSMC or Samsung.
    Oh, but Intel is making DG2 on TSMC 7 nm!

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Originally posted by milkylainen View Post
    Wth. Arc? Brand management?
    I think they should take a page from their CPU division.
    Choose one name and stick to it.
    Are you saying they should've stuck with Xe? That was always problematic, due to being the chemical symbol for Xenon, which is way too damn close to their Xeon branding.

    Originally posted by milkylainen View Post
    Core has sucked for 15 years.
    Fixed that for you.

    "Core" was one of the dumbest names they could've chosen, right at the dawn of the multi-core CPU era. I'm sure it's caused a tremendous amount of unnecessary confusion, over the past 1.5 decades.

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Originally posted by dlq84 View Post
    GPU mining will mostly be dead by then.
    We can only hope.

    GPU mining already died several times before...

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Originally posted by M@GOid View Post
    I sincerely hope that the name wasn't chosen because of high power requirements in these cards...
    It sounds like they confused high-performance with high-voltage!

    Leave a comment:


  • kaidenshi
    replied
    Originally posted by doomie View Post

    i mean, and i don't expect exactly this, but i'd risk a mined 3080 for like $100
    Maybe I've just been lucky, but I've bought three used "miner" cards at super low prices in the past few years with no issues. It's my understanding that miners will re-flash the card with a firmware that reduces voltages and fan speeds to get the most performance/watt out of the cards. Two of the ones I bought were sold with full disclosure and after I flashed back to factory (and replaced one fan on one) they have been working fine. The third wasn't advertised as a mining card but it was obviously detuned, and flashing the firmware back to stock got it back in shape too. They were all Radeon cards, btw.

    Leave a comment:


  • rmfx
    replied
    Originally posted by milkylainen View Post
    Wth. Arc? Brand management?
    I think they should take a page from their CPU division.
    Choose one name and stick to it.
    Core has worked well for 15 years.
    Nvidias "GeForce" for more than two decades.
    I think that’s the plan.
    But Xe was a stupid name. It could be prononced many ways, it needed the case Xe to be recognizable.
    So they fixed this terrible bad marketing before releasing anything…

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X