Originally posted by tildearrow
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Gen12/Xe Graphics Have AV1 Accelerated Decode - Linux Support Lands
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostSo... No H266 for at least a couple more years. Not surprised at all.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by lyamc View Post
I just want to mention that while AMD's h.264 encoder is terrible, AMD's HEVC encoder is fantastic.
So in the same vein in ~5 years when new hardware has av1 encode and decode expect the vp9 and hevc support to diminish or drop.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spacefish View PostAV1 decoding on the AMD GPU on APUs would definitely be a good thing for laptops / low power PCs... With Firefox slowly enabling VA-API on Linux and hopefully sometime later chromium will follow too, this could be a story for longer battery live by default, when watching videos in the browser on mobile devices.
I don´t really see the benefit of having a dedicated Encoder part in your GPU. It eats away valuable chip area and is used really seldom. In reality, only Game Streamers probably use it. Video Conferencing software does CPU encoding 99% of the time. Creators typically use the CPU based encoders as they offer better compression/quality.
Comment
-
Originally posted by clementhk View Post
I'm not a game streamer/creator, I do Skype/Zoom/Conference call, screen sharing/recording, send video on telegram/other app that would resample/compress video before sending, chopping recorded videos, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoveRPi View Post
None of those applications even taps into the GPU encoder/decoder. They use software based encoding and decoding. No many applications even take advantage of VAAPI.
And if you do use a browser based solution, they sometimes do use HW codecs too (but not necessarily for WebRTC, it's a tricky situation).
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoveRPi View Post
None of those applications even taps into the GPU encoder/decoder. They use software based encoding and decoding. No many applications even take advantage of VAAPI.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Orphis View Post
Quite wrong, most of them use HW codecs when possible. There are options for that in the settings on by default if you bothered to check.
And if you do use a browser based solution, they sometimes do use HW codecs too (but not necessarily for WebRTC, it's a tricky situation).
Comment
Comment