Nice to see Debian on the 2nd-ish place (Clear Linux doesn't really count in my eyes and CentOS Stream and CentOS 8 are basically the same), Buster was a really good release. Only the boot time is a mess compared the other Distros.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Benchmarking 11 Linux Distributions Across Dozens Of Workloads On The Intel Core i9 10980XE
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by birdie View PostI was talking about GCC compilation flags, you countered with ... CPU HW vulnerabilities mitigations which are enabled on all Linux distros by default and all have roughly the same performance impact - actually recent kernels are less affected because some of these mitigations have been optimized unlike RHEL where they use the initial "slow" versions of them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
I'm not so sure that the mitigation settings are so similar, there are also other security tools like selinux vs apparmor are not similar. The default security settings vary from distribution to distribution and certainly have an impact on performance. Personally I have tried many distributions and I have never noticed great differences, especially for a desktop user, for this reason I don't give much importance to the benchmarks, I wouldn't like that even the distributions began to think more about performance than about security, they would end up like Intel.
Comment
-
The x265 benchmarks are clearly botched, there's no way that Clear Linux is ~40% faster than the rest, most of the hot code in x265 is hand optimized assembly. Are the other builds not using any optimization settings at all and thus defaulting to -O0 ? And of course the same goes for VP9 encoding test, and possibly the DAV1D test as well.
Please fix these, they reflect poorly on Phoronix benchmarking.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grinch View PostThe x265 benchmarks are clearly botched, there's no way that Clear Linux is ~40% faster than the rest, most of the hot code in x265 is hand optimized assembly. Are the other builds not using any optimization settings at all and thus defaulting to -O0 ? And of course the same goes for VP9 encoding test, and possibly the DAV1D test as well.
Please fix these, they reflect poorly on Phoronix benchmarking.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lumks View PostI also would like to have Arch in there. I mean common, it's a one time setup you have to do. And no, Manjaro is not Arch, also not in performance of some things.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by edwaleni View PostSo its very possible (I haven't looked under the hood) that Intel did do some optimizations.
It's a shame because these tests are very interesting, but when the results are as here, clearly bogus, it makes them all suspect.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I also would like to have Arch in there
There is no default install of Arch, even if you just follow the wiki and find yourself just booted, you'd still have to install quite a lot of packages of your personal choosing even to be able to run most of the tests.
Comment
Comment