It's time for me to build a new AMD-only gaming PC. Now if only bitcoiners did not buy any and all Polaris cards in existence...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Linux Benchmarks: 27-Way CPU Comparison On Ubuntu
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by eydee View PostIncluding overclocked results too would be nice, considering that barely anyone runs a Ryzen at stock speed.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by r1348 View PostIt's time for me to build a new AMD-only gaming PC. Now if only bitcoiners did not buy any and all Polaris cards in existence...
Comment
-
Lower single thread performance are mainly because of lower frequency, in some tests it loses to Intel CPU's (AVX) in some wins over 7700k even, that doesn't mean much tho, it's still great CPU, and well worth upgrade from the old FX series (especially 4000-6000). That said, single threaded performance are just fine, i7-3700/4700 CPU's are still good CPU's, and for this price, R5 1400 doesn't have competition to be honest.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Veerappan View Post
Umm... my R7 1700 is still stock speed. Note: Not everyone overclocks. Some just want to get work done without having to wonder why their system just locked up.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Postx2, last time I overclocked a CPU was my Celeron 300A, from 300 Mhz to 466 Mhz, back in 1998. I have no interest in overclocking. System instability, higher power consumption, and shorter component life to get 2 fps better in some game? Uh.... no thanks.
I'm looking at the Ryzen 1700 with quite some interest, but I'll probably wait for Zen 2 as my current rig is still valid (Core i5 [email protected] GHz with 16 Gb of 2400MHz DDR3) and with the prices of RAM and GPU being what they are these days, building a new rig would be expensive.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
So, certain tasks like FLAC encoding... the encoder is single-threaded, favouring clock speed over parallelism. But presumably in real-world usage, people often have multiple audio streams to encode - so I'd be interested in seeing how things compare if you take advantage of that. Take 50 audio samples, and see which processor can complete all 50 in the shortest time... see whether the Intel speed advantage is countered by the ability of Ryzen to do more at once...
Comment
-
Originally posted by mitch074 View Post
Been there done that to my Cely 300A too, except I've kept doing it on AMD CPUs for the last 15 years - they do have a tendency to overclock well. The worst I had from AMD was a Duron 950 (frequency wouldn't go up), but I suspect the motherboard was mainly at fault there. I also did overclocks on 1600 MHz Sempron64 (up to 2400MHz, rock stable that were used daily for 5-6 years), a X2 3800+ ([email protected], +20%) and a X4 620 ([email protected] on stock voltage). As I buy quite a lot of DVDs and BDs and systematically archive them with x264, it's quite frequent that I keep a PC running on all cores for hours on end - as such stability (and heat) is paramount.
I'm looking at the Ryzen 1700 with quite some interest, but I'll probably wait for Zen 2 as my current rig is still valid (Core i5 [email protected] GHz with 16 Gb of 2400MHz DDR3) and with the prices of RAM and GPU being what they are these days, building a new rig would be expensive.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
Cool memories. I once had a Duron 600 that OCd to 1.1ghz, very nearly a double overclock. Something like that would be impossible in todays world.
Comment
Comment