Originally posted by ruthan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA Jetson TX2 Linux Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostI agree that comparing to some other platforms would be nice (though the Pi3 is extremely weak in comparison - there are other ARM boards that might be better to compare to) but no, this board is not suitable for Android, at all. It has features that, to my knowledge, Android doesn't use. In fact I haven't yet found anything from Nvidia that mentions Android at all, but they do mention Linux:
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by rhysk View PostAndroid works fine on the predecessor Tegra X1. The Nvidia SHIELD TV (2015 and 2017 editions) are Tegra X1-based systems that run Android.
Comment
-
That Jetson is a sexy ARM beast. I'd be interested to see gaming performance with it. Obviously ARM compiled FOSS games.
I wonder how feasible would to get x86 emulation working on it like QEMU or Eltechs. Would be cool to figure out a way to get 3D acceleration working with x86 emulation.Last edited by Xaero_Vincent; 14 March 2017, 02:43 PM.
Comment
-
I can't help but be a bit disappointed. I expected the GPU performance difference to be on the order of Maxwell vs. Pascal, but it seems about half that? I guess the TX1 was a 20 nm part, IIRC.
Originally posted by dungeon View PostThis should be compared to Intel's Goldmont i guess... to something like this $99 x86:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...82E16813157731
Considering the price of this thing, one of the mobile Kaby Lake SKUs would make a lot more sense. In the iGPU department, I'd still give this thing an edge over anything other than the Iris Pro graphics. TX2 might still win in power-efficiency, though.
IMO, the main reason people would use this board is for robotics or other cases where they need a fast, power-efficient GPU in a small form factor.Last edited by coder; 14 March 2017, 03:29 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by coder View PostWell, it'd be an interesting CPU core comparison, but the GPUs really aren't comparable.
For those who wants comparison with RPi3 on CPU see there... somewhat about 4 times faster
http://hackaday.com/2017/03/14/hands...edded-devices/
It is not ideal comparison as PI does not run 64bit arm, but OK probably in best case scenario maybe we can count on 3 times on average at leastLast edited by dungeon; 14 March 2017, 03:40 PM.
Comment
-
It was fun just taking those few benchmarks through some results on openbenchmarking. Those results show the TX2 being 2 to 3 times faster than the RPi 3 (not 4). Also nice to see where it could beat the AMD 5150 and E1's as well as the lower end older (but not terribly so) Celerons. Would be nice to have a complete set of benchmarks, but this was still good enough for a comparison.
Comment
-
Originally posted by coder View PostI can't help but be a bit disappointed. I expected the GPU performance difference to be on the order of Maxwell vs. Pascal, but it seems about half that? I guess the TX1 was a 20 nm part, IIRC.
Well, it'd be an interesting CPU core comparison, but the GPUs really aren't comparable.
Considering the price of this thing, one of the mobile Kaby Lake SKUs would make a lot more sense. In the iGPU department, I'd still give this thing an edge over anything other than the Iris Pro graphics. TX2 might still win in power-efficiency, though.
IMO, the main reason people would use this board is for robotics or other cases where they need a fast, power-efficient GPU in a small form factor.
I was speaking to a potential customer about these things over the weak-end. His outfit does SOTA vibration R&D and QA testing, where data collection bandwidth and latency are critical. I don't know if the USB3 on JTX2 will be sufficient for him. It might, but if not the camera port should be if he can tie into it without too much pain.
He probably doesn't need the GPU/Cuda, but any links to the IO aspect of Jetson or other Tegra or other embedded boards will be welcome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pipe13 View PostMore, "...they need a fast, power-efficient GPU in a small form factor" with low-latency high-bandwidth IO.
I was speaking to a potential customer about these things over the weak-end. His outfit does SOTA vibration R&D and QA testing, where data collection bandwidth and latency are critical. I don't know if the USB3 on JTX2 will be sufficient for him. It might, but if not the camera port should be if he can tie into it without too much pain.
He probably doesn't need the GPU/Cuda, but any links to the IO aspect of Jetson or other Tegra or other embedded boards will be welcome.
BTW, maybe you already saw this, but here's more info (incl. links to datasheets, if you look carefully):Last edited by coder; 14 March 2017, 05:43 PM.
Comment
Comment