Originally posted by Qaridarium
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ampere Altra vs. Amazon Graviton2 Linux Performance Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DanielG View PostSo after comparing some of the results, the main takeaway is that the performance per MHz is identical - in all the 64core test results I checked the Ampere Altra is about 32% faster, at 32% higher clockrate.
One thing to watch out for is benchmarks like Coremark, which is carefully to avoid memory bottlenecks. So, they really tell you nothing about scaling (other than thermal or power throttling, which Altra avoids due to its efficiency and the lack of an effective turbo).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium View Postbelieve it or not but they even plan to put the SSD on the cpu die do. to save the copy between ssd and ram.
The second is that there'd be no practical benefit. The fastest SSDs are Optane (or 3D XPoint), which is still about 1/10th as fast as DRAM. If you look at NAND, it's even slower.
So, it's difficult to see how they would cram those dies in the CPU package, and it's not clear what benefit i would even provide. Also, SSDs tend to wear out faster than CPUs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
I really wish that i could unterstand what you said... sorry i do not.
what is ARC Executes ?
according to google something like this: "ARC executes U.S. Army Patriot Missile Battery Redeployment to Germany. BREMERHAVEN, GERMANY – Under contract with American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier (ARC), M/V Merchant discharged a U.S. Army Patriot missile battery in Bremerhaven on January 2 after it had been used in support of ongoing NATO operations in Turkey."
GOD is REAL unless declared as an INTEGER.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by f0rmat View Post
That ARC is the Allied Reaction Corps - it is a NATO organization. They do have M1s - but they are quite a bit different than the Apple ones you are referring to.Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium View Post
we really should benchmark the M1 tanks on phoronix.com... maybe we can profile their software stack and maybe we can tune their aiming performance speed to kill faster..GOD is REAL unless declared as an INTEGER.
Comment
-
Originally posted by coder View PostThis can't be true, for at least 2 reasons. First is practical -- just look at all of the space occupied by chips on a M.2 SSD board and you'll see how much they would have to cram into it. Also, SSDs don't like super-high temperatures, so that would place an artifically low thermal ceiling on the CPU.
The second is that there'd be no practical benefit. The fastest SSDs are Optane (or 3D XPoint), which is still about 1/10th as fast as DRAM. If you look at NAND, it's even slower.
So, it's difficult to see how they would cram those dies in the CPU package, and it's not clear what benefit i would even provide. Also, SSDs tend to wear out faster than CPUs.
Not exactly SSD on the SoC, but in that direction.
Mainly depends on how rapidly STM density continues to rise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by f0rmat View PostInteresting idea...phoronix.com could do a comparison of the software stack of the M1, Merkava, Leopold, T-72M, and T-90. They might also include - in a different test utilizing 150mm and up architecture - the fire control systems for the M109A6, 2S19, AS90, KRAB, Caesar, and G6. I think the only issue would be getting those software stacks. I might be wrong, but I do not think those software stacks are open source. At least, I have not found them in GitHub or anywhere else.
most people think opensource means public... no it it also opensource if an developer hands the source code to the customer and no one not the developer and not the customer ever make it public,Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium View Postalso i have to tell you that RISC-V-GPU is already death all the projects about RISC-V-GPU switched to IBM POWER ISA...
Comment
Comment