Originally posted by starshipeleven
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RadeonSI/RADV Mesa 17.3 + AMDGPU DC vs. NVIDIA 387.12 Linux Gaming Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
Because if running most of the tests at 1080p, there is no scaling with the higher-end parts.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Sorry but these results shows that AMD is not good as Nvidia even a slight.
Look at min fps. On Nvidia side , it is more than double of Amd results.
There are still looongg way to go for Amd. These dips will return you as stuttering which is a bad thing for gaming.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post4k makes sense on 43'' screens, as there it has a similar PPI (pixel per square inch) of a normal fullhd PC monitor, so you actually have more space.
If you buy smaller screens then you need to upscale your applications or it's too small to be read, and this defies the point of a 4k screen.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by slacka View PostThese benchmarks are valuable for those looking to buy hardware, not to see how Vulkan drivers are maturing.
For now, the most important part is, if AMD on Linux is competitive (which it is) and if studios allocate more manpower for Vulkan implementation (which is also the case). With that in mind and hoping for future games to be a tad bit better optimized, we can "guess" a little, if the raw horsepower of AMD cards will be put on the road. In any case, the results are looking good for the most part.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
ParaView was recently added to the Phoronix Test Suite as a visualization/workstation-focused test. Sadly here we see RadeonSI performing extremely poorly and see why NVIDIA dominates in the workstation space, besides CUDA and other factors driving its marketshare in that segment.Test signature
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leopard View PostSorry but these results shows that AMD is not good as Nvidia even a slight.
Look at min fps. On Nvidia side , it is more than double of Amd results.
There are still looongg way to go for Amd. These dips will return you as stuttering which is a bad thing for gaming.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wielkie G View Post
Like min-fps metric makes any sense. So if one driver makes a single 3fps dip during scene startup then it automatically loses? Thanks, but I will judge smoothness using less retarded means.
Did you even encountered one of them on CS:GO and Rocket League , Dota 2 like games?
It is not so important on single player games that much , but it is critical on multiplayer.
Also go do your AMD fanboying somewhere else. I also love AMD but i'm smart enough for not calling bad results as good ones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bridgman View Post
I don't understand this comment... wouldn't a comparison of workstation driver to workstation driver for ParaView make more sense ?
- Likes 12
Comment
Comment