Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ahead Of Radeon RX Vega, AMDGPU+RadeonSI Is Offering The Most Competitive Performance Yet Against NVIDIA On Linux

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ahead Of Radeon RX Vega, AMDGPU+RadeonSI Is Offering The Most Competitive Performance Yet Against NVIDIA On Linux

    Phoronix: Ahead Of Radeon RX Vega, AMDGPU+RadeonSI Is Offering The Most Competitive Performance Yet Against NVIDIA On Linux

    With the Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 shipping in two weeks, here are some benchmarks of the latest Radeon and NVIDIA Linux graphics drivers with an assortment of modern GPUs. With these latest Linux GPU results are also the current performance-per-Watt and thermal metrics as recorded automatically via the Phoronix Test Suite benchmarking software. This Radeon vs. NVIDIA Linux comparison should be particularly interesting given the very good Mesa Git performance results posted yesterday that show RadeonSI performing well beyond the AMDGPU-PRO OpenGL levels.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=24997

  • #2
    rx 480 consistently beating gtx 1060 YES!!

    Comment


    • #3
      "while the R9 Fury is just ahead of the R9 Fury."
      Typo.

      Comment


      • #4
        Since RadeonSI seems to rock in our days, does anyone know where I can find any of these? (RAM size doesn't matter)
        https://www.custompcreview.com/revie...s-card-review/
        http://www.hisdigital.com/gb/product2-940.shtml

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Apopas View Post
          "while the R9 Fury is just ahead of the R9 Fury."
          Typo.
          Fixed, thanks.
          Michael Larabel
          http://www.michaellarabel.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by davidbepo View Post
            rx 480 consistently beating gtx 1060 YES!!
            Yep the GL results this time caught me by surprise.
            Michael Larabel
            http://www.michaellarabel.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by davidbepo View Post
              rx 480 consistently beating gtx 1060 YES!!
              It may be a regression on nvidia's side. It does not reflect windows/directx benchmark results, a.k.a. what the hardware is actually capable of.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by eydee View Post

                It may be a regression on nvidia's side. It does not reflect windows/directx benchmark results, a.k.a. what the hardware is actually capable of.
                And here i thought NVidia's drivers were perfect and never had regressions.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The thing is that a teraflop is a teraflop, so a 7 teraflops radeon is as strong as a 7 teraflops geforce. The only difference is the circumstances under those the full strength of each is visible. So i'm very sorry for those who bought fps and not teraflops years ago. Also i think that a D3D11 state tracker may come soon and compensate those who bought open source even more.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well very good results for the Fury card, is that with AMDGPU or RadeonSI driver running on the Fury, never can tell. Anyway I hope RADV and those benchmark optimizations come fast, I would really love to see Vulkan perform excellently like it should for AMD hardware under Linux. AMD really should be kicking NVIDIA's ass with Vulkan!
                    Last edited by theriddick; 07-31-2017, 09:00 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X