Originally posted by DRanged
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Open-Source Radeon Driver Performance Against NVIDIA Linux Gaming For March 2021
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by darkbasic View Post
Phoronix is no regular reviewer because it's basically the only one doing Linux GPU reviews with a large audience. Nobody wants the 6900XT on Windows because it lacks so many features compared to the 3090 including good encoders, decent RTX performance, DLSS etc. On Linux on the other hand it wins hands down and yet you miss the opportunity of good free coverage.
For linux the story is different because features like DLSS 2 aren't available on Linux (yet) although the encoders/decoders are (seriously AMD, just get your ass into gear and improve the situation with encoders/decoders on your graphics cards, this is a really easy way to get higher end users to buy your cards).
Also note that the 3090 does end up being on average faster than the 6900XT for 4k most likely due to the fact that at such high resolution the infinity cache is not as effective.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostFor linux the story is different because features like DLSS 2 aren't available on Linux (yet) although the encoders/decoders are (seriously AMD, just get your ass into gear and improve the situation with encoders/decoders on your graphics cards, this is a really easy way to get higher end users to buy your cards).
Also note that the 3090 does end up being on average faster than the 6900XT for 4k most likely due to the fact that at such high resolution the infinity cache is not as effective.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aht0 View PostWait, Radeon's hardware video encoder/decoder works in Linux drivers?
Comment
-
Originally posted by angrypie View PostOf course they do. What happens often is that applications have to be told to use GPU acceleration, but e.g. with a Chromium-like browser or MPV, you can see the GPU being used in radeontop while playing a video.
Comment
-
Originally posted by angrypie
Yeah I meant encoder, but if you're going to be pissy about a word you can infer from context I won't bother replying to you anymore.
"Sorry, I meant encoder, my bad"
But instead you got upset that aht0 would be so careless as to read the words you wrote, and nothing more.
Maybe you should be less careless when writing comments?
Comment
Comment