NVIDIA RTX 2060 / 2070 / 2080 SUPER Linux Gaming Performance - 26 GPUs Benchmarked

[phoronix]

Phoronix: NVIDIA RTX 2060 / 2070 / 2080 SUPER Linux Gaming Performance - 26 GPUs Benchmarked

We finally have our hands on NVIDIA's current RTX 20 SUPER graphics card line-up and have been putting the RTX 2060/2070/2080 SUPER cards through their paces under Linux. For the first of our long awaited NVIDIA RTX SUPER Linux benchmarks, first up is a look at the Linux gaming performance under a variety of native OpenGL/Vulkan games as well as Steam Play (DXVK+Proton) titles while testing a total of 26 graphics cards this round on the very latest AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce drivers.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=28291

[pmorph]

So.. the extra you pay for RTX2070 over RTX2060/Super is for the heating it provides at winter time.

[tildearrow]

Typos:

Total War: Three Kingoms is one of the newest Linux game ports by Feral Interactive and rendered on Linux using Vulksn.

The RTX 2070 SUPER a 9.5% increase in performance over the non-SUPER variant.

You a word.

with the performnace-per-Watt.

The SUPER cards also are deliveing better performance-per-Watt.

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 series was offering comparable performance-per-dollar to the RTX 2060 and RTX 2060.

And thus Michael wrote an article about NVIDIA and NVIDIA.

But for today here are some ending overview metrics,

(should be ':')

the games with the Radeon driver issues being ommitted

[tildearrow]

This sucks... Now NVIDIA releases a card that:
- is better than the 5700 XT (AMD's best offering)
- consumes less power than the 5700 XT

AMD come on, release that 5990 XT already with 128 cores...

[Michael]

Typos:

Thanks as always, too much benchmarking this month/quarter, benchmarked brain too much.

[FireBurn]

Thanks as always, too much benchmarking this month/quarter, benchmarked brain too much.

Isn't it all automated though

[Michael]

Isn't it all automated though

Yes except juggling lots of hardware swapping, article writing, and related besides just the benchmark process itself.

[Stenka]

Sad for Navi...

[tuke81]

This sucks... Now NVIDIA releases a card that:
- is better than the 5700 XT (AMD's best offering)
- consumes less power than the 5700 XT

AMD come on, release that 5990 XT already with 128 cores...

Well Super cards were out before Navi. Either way highend is not what most people buy and no I'm not calling >$350 cards midrange.

The real battle will be on midrange(Sweet pot being $200-$250 range), after smaller Navi releases and Nvidia's response to them. But smaller Turings does not have RTX burden to carry out so I'm not expecting AMD beating those in perf/W.

[philips]

GTX 1080Ti lower in performance than GTX 1660 and RX 570? (Hitman results)