Why not give crouton a thought?
I got my C720 in the mail at the beginning of the week. I had the back off and installed the MyDigitalSSD 64GB first thing. After trying a couple of distros, I gave crouton a try. Since it uses the underlying system as a base, I didn't have any of the issues I was having to work around on others (namely trackpad compatibility, cpupower/fan issues). I used Debian/Sid as my target, and then installed fluxbox from within the chroot as I am mostly interested in the command line tools available from a full distro.
I ran this against the benchmarks from Michael's article and uploaded them to here. I haven't been successful in getting the HPC challenge to run, but I feel pretty good about the results nonetheless.
What I found interesting is that the speeds between the two are mostly on track. The better graphics scores are due to the improvements in Mesa. Even with that, I was expecting less due to running off a chroot in VT2 and being limited to the kernel 3.8.11 that ships with Chrome OS.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Acer C720 Chromebook Delivers Fast Ubuntu Performance
Collapse
X
-
This chromebook seems very interesting to me, but I can't seem to find any information at all about the GPU.
I know it's a Intel HD Graphics Honeywell IGP, but since there are quite a lot with different results, it is hard to see how it actually performs.
Normally I would check on videocardbenchmarks.net but its not on there.
Is there a other Videocard you can compare the results with so I can get a idea on the performance?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by carewolf View PostIf it something that like happens with Macbook Pros, that means the Macbook Pro numbers are not off, but in fact more realistic than the number sof a complete new and unused MbP (and that Macbook Pros are just kind of crap).
(Though it is true that if you have an average power draw higher than what the charger can deliver you will also see throttling presumably if the battery is still working, but I'm not sure how this would work exactly and I suspect it can only really happen with combined cpu+gpu load over a long time (2+ hours).
I won't disagree though this is kind of crappy behavior, the sole reason for this is to keep the charger a small little box - similar specced pc notebooks come with power adapters twice the output capability (if not more) and they are obviously larger (and more heavy).Last edited by mczak; 31 December 2013, 02:20 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mczak View PostThe Macbook Pro numbers are very seriously off. There's no way a core i5 520m can't keep up with a C2D T9300 or even the old Core Duo in some cases. I think there's 2 possible explanations for this:
1) Missing reclocking support of the nvidia graphics chip causes lots of power draw, in turn causes cpu thermal throttling due to insufficient cooling. IIRC though most notebook graphics chips tend to use low clocks not high ones at bootup, so this seems unlikely.
2) The battery is dead (not just low capacity but the controller refuses to charge/use it). This will cause some very heavy (undocumented and hidden) cpu throttling on these MacBooks. The reason for that behavior is because the peak power draw of these notebooks is in fact higher than what the charger can provide it relies on the battery to be able to provide enough power for these peaks. And if the battery is dead it will use some well hidden throttling mechanism so it can never reach those peaks in the first place. Having experienced this just recently this is definitely no fun (though that was on a SNB MacBook Pro - it did get reduced to a constant 0.8Ghz frequency even though the cpu freq indicators were still saying 2.4Ghz+... - I think on pre-SNB MacBooks throttling mechanism is a bit different and more like a fixed factor of 2).
There might be other possiblities (like thermal throttling due to broken fan) but in any case something is definitely not right.
Leave a comment:
-
I've just uploaded the results from my Lenovo IdeaPad S205:
OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoronix Test Suite, Linux benchmarking, automated benchmarking, benchmarking results, benchmarking repository, open source benchmarking, benchmarking test profiles
It's impressive how much the Haswell Celeron kicks ass.
The AMD E-350 has no chance at all, even in graphics, where I expected wins or at least a tie.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jay Lee View PostTo install the touchpad drivers, run:
curl -O -L http://goo.gl/kz917j; sudo bash kz917j
this is stolen from my ChrUbuntu script but should work if you installed Ubuntu directly via USB also.
Leave a comment:
-
Touchpad Drivers
To install the touchpad drivers, run:
curl -O -L http://goo.gl/kz917j; sudo bash kz917j
this is stolen from my ChrUbuntu script but should work if you installed Ubuntu directly via USB also.
Leave a comment:
-
I owned this device (the 4gb model) for a couple weeks and used Ubuntu on it, so I thought I'd share some thoughts.
As others have mentioned in this thread, the M.2/NGFF SSD is upgradeable. There is only one brand of SSD currently available. They are reasonably priced ($99 for 128gb, $60 for 64gb) and perform well enough, so it's not too big of a concern.
Battery life is in the 7~8 hr range. Very good for a cheap laptop.
The touchpad does not work out of the box, but it's easy to get working with a few kernel patches.
Suspend works with some tweaking. Basically everything else just works.
Build quality is not bad. I didn't have any complaints about it. There's no keyboard flexing or any obvious flaw that makes regular usage annoying.
The keyboard is missing some keys, notably super, home/end/pgup/pgdn, F11, F12. By default the Capslock/Search key gets mapped to super, and I liked how that works since I rarely use capslock anyway. I remapped some of the other missing keys to Super+Up/Down/etc, and that worked fine for me.
The screen is pretty bad. It's the typical, cheap TN material that goes into low end laptops. This is mostly why I wound up returning my C720. I did think the 1366x768 resolution was okay for a 11.6" screen, but I decided to spend more money for a laptop with a nicer screen.
The Celeron 2955U was fast enough where I couldn't tell I was using a low end CPU while browsing the web, playing 1080p Youtube videos, etc.
Overall the C720 was solid to use as a cheap, portable laptop. Very compelling at $250 or even $350 if we include a 128gb SSD.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostI have not seen any Kabanis yet, but where I live there are 11" Kavaris up for sale at reasonably low prices.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostApple still does this with the newer Macbooks and MacBook Pros? I'm surprised.
Anyway, it's not exactly a fixed factor of 2. I owned a while MacBook that was powered by Intel's Napa (refresh) platform (that's even before Santa Rosa!) and had a processor clocked at 1.83GHz. When the battery is removed and the notebook powered solely on AC, the frequency dropped to 1.0GHz.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: