Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: MSI Radeon HD 6450 - Good budget card for R600g?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Just be glad you didn't mention BSD
    Or Lennart Poettering.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    It's not true. Where I live electricity cost 0.7RUR/kWh (around 0.017EUR/kWh). I think it's cheap - I'm wrong?
    Where I live (outside Toronto, Canada) it's about 0.18 CDN per KWh, or about 0.14 EUR, not including taxes. If you look at the bill it says more like 0.10/KWh for the electricity, but there's another 0.07/KWh added for delivery and 0.01/KWh for "debt retirement charge" so it adds up pretty fast.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    You have no idea.
    1st "vote with your wallet" is not an illusion. The GPU and driver type will display in every statistic - for example on upcoming Steam stat.
    Passive cooling is best thing you can do, because it reduces noise, vibrations, EMI and amount of dust pumped through the tower. Still, if one would go for passive cooling, its better to either watercool to huge passive radiator or use an all-Cu case and connect every component to it by means of heatpipes. For machines with lower energy drain, passive is definately better than fan cooling, if its working.

    Also, AMD GPUs are much more energy efficient and with larger field of usage than that of Nvidia. Nvidias are strict gaming cards.
    Electricity is cheap my ass, perhaps if you live in Bagamas. In EU the average cost is now 25 eurocent/kWh, three years before it was ~17 eurocent.
    If the AMD card is 'working.' Yeah, that's the key, isn't it?

    I still read on here that these cards are not working with the open source driver and you eliminate the option of using hardware decoding right off the bat by virtue of it being AMD. So much for open source when you can't even use the features the card is supposed to have. How well does the acceleration work?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,275

    Default

    I would try to find a used GTX 460 (1GB if possible). There should be some floating around and that way, you get VDPAU (I like AMD, but I get the feeling pigs will fly before their damned lawyers allow them to really open up UVD).

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,104

    Default

    6450 TDP - 18W
    GTX 460 TDP - needs its own nuclear plant (I kid, I kid)

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panix View Post
    If the AMD card is 'working.' Yeah, that's the key, isn't it?

    I still read on here that these cards are not working with the open source driver and you eliminate the option of using hardware decoding right off the bat by virtue of it being AMD. So much for open source when you can't even use the features the card is supposed to have. How well does the acceleration work?
    These cards work with opensource driver. The 3D performance currently is "acceptable": http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...RA-1212312RA16 This 260GTX were mine. The 4core CPUs across the board deliver near same performance, so you can judge.

    Yes, no video acceleration currently, this relies on CPU. But I personally found out that it is better to accelerate every codec, than only bunch of them. I wait for working HSA/OpenCL which claimed to be opensource.
    The GPUs recieve a lot of attention recently on all opensource drivers. So its my choice, but everyone has to choose himself.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanL View Post
    I would try to find a used GTX 460 (1GB if possible). There should be some floating around and that way, you get VDPAU (I like AMD, but I get the feeling pigs will fly before their damned lawyers allow them to really open up UVD).
    These comments are very weird. I don't know if it's jest or what...

    The guy is asking for a new Mini, you guys are recommending buying a used vintage Ferrari Testarossa off ebay.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panix View Post
    I still read on here that these cards are not working with the open source driver and you eliminate the option of using hardware decoding right off the bat by virtue of it being AMD. So much for open source when you can't even use the features the card is supposed to have. How well does the acceleration work?
    Panix is still reading the internet, so he remains the ultimate authority telling us AMD users what works and what doesn't

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panix View Post
    I still read on here that these cards are not working with the open source driver and you eliminate the option of using hardware decoding right off the bat by virtue of it being AMD. So much for open source when you can't even use the features the card is supposed to have. How well does the acceleration work?
    A little advice Panix - learn to stage your battles. Only post this crap in a thread which was not already started with a presumption of contentment with the R600g drivers.

    The features I want from the card work. That is why I consider buying them.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    446

    Default The biggest problem I have with the HD6450

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamish Wilson View Post
    Still, I have heard some bad things about the 6450, so I wanted to ask if anyone has some experience with the card.
    Mesa -git (i.e. 9.1-devel) supports the HD6450 very well. However, Fedora 17 ships with only Mesa 8.0.4 and an old version of libdrm. Hopefully Fedora 18 will address both of these issues, but Mesa 8.0.4 cannot even run OpenGL xscreensavers correctly on an HD6450. Nor can it run Minecraft 1.4.6. But it can run World of Warcraft, bizarrely enough - at approx 20-30 fps at 1280x1024.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •