Originally posted by humbug
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD FreeSync Support On Linux?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Jedibeeftrix View PostNot quite:
280 (7970), and 270 (7870) series GPU's are still 'current'. Fiji will be the first GCN 1.3 architecture, and I believe that the Carrizo APU will be the same.
For clarity I am neither confirming nor denying your forecast of GFX block versions.Test signature
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostYes, time will tell the story - but currently for me it is, as neither feature works across vendors.
Nvidia is not licensing their stuff, nor they allow other to codevelop G-Sync.
G-Sync thus will forever stay lock-in :P
Comment
-
It is vendor lockin either way If you have GSync monitor, AMD (or Intel or whatever) does not do anything to use that capability or otherwise if you have FreeSync monitor one nVidia does not do anything to use it .
Originally posted by Jedibeeftrix View PostFiji will be the first GCN 1.3 architecture, and I believe that the Carrizo APU will be the same.Last edited by dungeon; 25 March 2015, 01:49 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stqn View PostAnyone compared freesync or gsync with simply using compton to remove tearing?
It could be a specific Compton configuration option I have enabled, not sure. Or an issue with the NVIDIA driver, perhaps.
BTW, G-Sync does work great on games in Linux, as far as I can tell.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostIt is vendor lockin either way If you have GSync monitor, AMD (or Intel or whatever) does not do anything to use that capability
Comment
-
It is pure vendor lockin above all . Nvidia cage to choose or other vendor cage - that is the lockin question, pick your poison as always Well, those are just excuses:
On one hand, Intel and AMD can say "nVidia does not allow us to do it - so yeah sorry, we can't support GSync" .
On the other hand you have nVidia, who said "we won't implement FreeSync support, because we have GSync... and you know what, fuck the standards - we don't need it"
And on the final third hand (yes that is the hand ) where we understands that those companies doing this only because of their business ways, customers are all locked in people, with just a little difference... if you like words like "morons and half smart asses or somethin'" we should be it - that must be best way to describe our positions as customers
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostIt is pure vendor lockin above all . Nvidia cage to choose or other vendor cage - that is the lockin question, pick your poison as always Well, those are just excuses:
On one hand, Intel and AMD can say "nVidia does not allow us to do it - so yeah sorry, we can't support GSync" .
On the other hand you have nVidia, who said "we won't implement FreeSync support, because we have GSync... and you know what, fuck the standards - we don't need it"
And on the final third hand (yes that is the hand ) where we understands that those companies doing this only because of their business ways, customers are all locked in people, with just a little difference... if you like words like "morons and half smart asses or somethin'" we should be it - that must be best way to describe our positions as customers
I don't think that's what most people would call it.
Comment
Comment