Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FEX 2305 Emulator On ARM Adds More AVX Instructions, Optimizations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FEX 2305 Emulator On ARM Adds More AVX Instructions, Optimizations

    Phoronix: FEX 2305 Emulator On ARM Adds More AVX Instructions, Optimizations

    FEX-Emu 2305 has been released, the open-source project continuing to work on x86_64 atop 64-bit ARM (AArch64) emulation support for being able to enjoy more games on ARM Linux and other software not otherwise natively available...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    How does FEX fare against box32 / box64 nowadays?

    Comment


    • #3
      Michael, how about some benchmarks of X86 emulators?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by NomadDemon View Post
        Michael, how about some benchmarks of X86 emulators?
        Yes i want benchmarks on rockchip rk3388s and apple M1/m2
        Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by qarium View Post

          Yes i want benchmarks on rockchip rk3388s and apple M1/m2
          I know who will win. I'm more curious in which programs in Linux the native emulators will give better performance than the Linux version of Rosetta 2, which compiles Ahead-of-Time (but relies on the strong memory model support in Apple Silicon - apps could be pinned to one CPU core to avoid the missing feature on Cortex SoCs, thus the benefit of non-Apple emulators would be only in heavily multithread apps).

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ladis View Post

            I know who will win. I'm more curious in which programs in Linux the native emulators will give better performance than the Linux version of Rosetta 2, which compiles Ahead-of-Time (but relies on the strong memory model support in Apple Silicon - apps could be pinned to one CPU core to avoid the missing feature on Cortex SoCs, thus the benefit of non-Apple emulators would be only in heavily multithread apps).
            its more about "how well it works", "is it usable to run some simple stuff on e.g. raspberry" "what are the numbers Mason" [call of duty quote]

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by NomadDemon View Post

              its more about "how well it works", "is it usable to run some simple stuff on e.g. raspberry" "what are the numbers Mason" [call of duty quote]
              Yes, half the apps is about runs/doesn't run. But I would not care about the performance on RPi - it's very old and thus very slow CPU compared to the modern Cortex SoCs.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ladis View Post
                I know who will win. I'm more curious in which programs in Linux the native emulators will give better performance than the Linux version of Rosetta 2, which compiles Ahead-of-Time (but relies on the strong memory model support in Apple Silicon - apps could be pinned to one CPU core to avoid the missing feature on Cortex SoCs, thus the benefit of non-Apple emulators would be only in heavily multithread apps).
                is it about who wins ? i don't think so... the apple hardware is of course faster but you do not get it for 200€

                the last rockchip 3388s benchmark was CPU only would be interesting to have some GPU benchmarks to.

                Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

                Comment

                Working...
                X